HawkInATX
Well-Known Member
There's a word for people who never question authority: Nazis.
Really? Really? Having faith in a college football coach is the same as allowing the holocaust? Perspective, maybe?
There's a word for people who never question authority: Nazis.
So true. Thanks for adding that.
Another example of perception not always being reality. Since you mentioned a "down year" I'll assume in this case you are measuring success by a won-loss record. Statistically speaking Fry is the more "successful" coach at Iowa.
Fry's overall win % - .616
KF's overall win % - .589
Fry's B10 win % - .611
KF's B10 win % - .542
Also, Hayden had a much bigger mountain to climb.
I said it over and over. It was not the losing that gave me such disdain for Kirk, it was the way Iowa lost. It was the playing not to lose, instead of playing to win. I was not wrong whatsoever about wanting KF gone, and neither was anyone else. We all thought that he was too stubborn to change and he gave us YEARS of data to back that up. Where we were wrong was that he was willing to make those changes. The changes that we all wanted a new coach to bring in. He thus far has re-invented himself. I'm certainly willing to give credit to KF for this season and finally going back to being aggressive as he was as a young coach. I was not wrong in wanting Kirk gone. I was wrong that Kirk wasn't willing to change and I accept that and am happy about it.
Really? Really? Having faith in a college football coach is the same as allowing the holocaust? Perspective, maybe?
You're right.
The Nelsons wagging their finger right now with their self-righteousness are waaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy worse than Nazis. Heck there are patheticos who want Kirk to give the hard-working, ticket-buying, bowl-traveling, legendarily-loyal fans the middle finger.
Good gawd, not the Tom Davis comparison AGAIN. Not even going to re-hash it because we all know what happened. Bottom line, the program had become very stale with a very manageable schedule the last 5 years. The ISU loss last year at home was inexcusable. At this point i do not care what the impetus was to re-invent himself and the program, he did it and it looks like it is working. He has acknowledged that at a lot of other places he would have been canned by now.
I swear if I hear the "careful what you wish for" argument with regards to Iowa athletics one more time my head will explode. It is such a defeatist attitude
Ok, so you don't like the Tom Davis comparison that is fair as they are 2 different sports. Just sticking with football Iowa was pretty miserable after Forest Evashevski decided he wanted to be a AD instead of the Head Coach. But I suppose the excuse here will be different circumstance, different ERA, am I right?
I disagree that my attitude is "defeatist" as I want Iowa to win as badly as anybody. But I don't believe change is always good, there have been plenty of examples of where a coaching change did not have good results. Being a blue blood football program is an incredibly tough mountain to climb, slipping back into mediocrity or into futility is easy. If you think Iowa football can reach that next level then, IMO, you will be disappointed. I would LOVE to be wrong on this but I don't believe Iowa could ever be a Ohio State or Alabama.
@alexzelada
Nothing that you mentioned will put Iowa into the upper tier of college football. Football is Iowa's cash cow, you put all that money into these things just so you have a chance to compete and to keep it making money. Go look at ISU, they are pouring money into their facilities as well. If you don't believe me at how slippery of a slope being at the top of college football can be just look at what is going on at Texas, they pour as much money into football as anybody.
Iowa is not sitting in the hotbed of D1 football talent, the state might produce 8 to 10 per year at the most. In order to compete at Iowa you have to do what Fry did and what Ferentz is doing right now, keep finding the needles in the haystack and hope you can compete every 3 or 4 years.
Actually by sustained success I was talking about the 3 straight top 10 finishes. Fry got us there, the 1985 season was one of my favorites.
I really don't want to get into a Fry vs Ferentz argument as I like them both and they each brought Iowa up to a new level.
To be fair Ferentz had one heck of a hill to climb as well. Let's not forget Fry's final season was 3-8 and Ferentz's first 2 seasons they were a combined 4-19.
So are you saying that fans like you deserve part of the credit for the turn around? I commend you for your honesty but if Iowa falters down the stretch or lays another 7-5 season next year most of those fans calling for his head will be back. There are people in the fan base that thinks Iowa should be doing what they are doing this year every year. Some of us (myself included) understands Iowa's place in the college football world, we are a middle of the pack team who will occasionally surprise everyone. The recruiting struggles will not disappear over night, this level of success is not sustainable over a long period of time. Ferentz has maintained a level of success at Iowa that even Hayden Fry could not sustain and there were people calling for his head after every down year as well.
Should we put you down as being 100% A-Okay with 34-30 in every 5 year stretch?
The U could've hired someone for 1 mil per year and been happy with 7 win Cyclone seasons.
Lol - you don't want to go there but you have.
Ultimately I guess it all depends on your definition of sustained. After those 3 in a row top 10 finishes, which ended in 2004, do you realize Iowa has finished ranked in the AP top 25 only twice?
During KF's tenure his teams have finished ranked 5 of his 16 full seasons or 31% of the time.
During Fry's tenure his teams finished ranked for 10 of his 20 seasons or 50% of the time.
For my money Fry's career fits a better narrative of sustained success.
There's a word for people who never question authority: Nazis.
You lost me right here, at 7 wins a Cyclone head coach is due for a raise and contract extension!
That might be a little over the top.