WinOneThisCentury
Well-Known Member
ANd again this is stupid. Look guys you can make excuses to why Uhl didn't shoot as well as White did as a freshman but the fact that White was a better shooter as a freshman is settled. It's not debatable. Uhl was not as good a shooter as White was a freshman. He wasn't close to as good a shooter from the floor from the line or from the arc.
Again in you can argue that he will improve and be better than white as a Soph, jr, or sr. Have at it and have a blast, but he was a significantly worse shooter as a freshman, period.
And for for those that think improved PT and opportunities automatically increase shooting percentage think again. Look at Matt Gatens from his freshman year where he wasn't counted on for anything and his sophomore year when he was expected to be a big contributor. Tell me what year he shot the ball better.
I knew you would go back to your statistics and percentage argument. Why bring Matt Gatens into this? You need to look no further than Aaron White who went from 27.9% to 22.7% with increased playing time and opportunity his sophomore year. It turns out he wasnt' such a good shooter from three...so he then took 50% less threes his junior year.
Let me say this one last time...then I'm done Forrest...Ok. There are some of us that feel Dom's shot looks better that what Aaron brought to the table in his freshman year. He didn't get the playing time Aaron did nor the shot opps, but it's not a stretch to think that's true. It's my opinion. that's all. You are right, Aaron shot a better percentage than Dom did. You are correct...it's not debatable. The truth is none of are debating that FACT.