More Hubbard info coming to light?

Sure it does. He can't serve his country, in many states he can't vote, or legally carry a firearm, or say "No" on a job application when asked if they are a felon.... there are lots of restriction ex cons face even when off paper.
DM is correct. As usual Chad gets owned. Arguing with him is like arguing with a 5yr old, only much more frustrating.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sure it does. He can't serve his country, in many states he can't vote, or legally carry a firearm, or say "No" on a job application when asked if they are a felon.... there are lots of restriction ex cons face even when off paper.

I've always wondered what it would be like to have a stalker :D
I've got him answering to Chad - ROFTLMAO. This it too easy.
 
I've got him answering to Chad - ROFTLMAO. This it too easy.

Well since you're too deluded to believe that my name could POSSIBLY something other than Chad (why don't you think of something that starts with a "T", since the initials in my screen name are "*t*m"), what choice do I have if I'm going to respond to you?
 
Well since you're too deluded to believe that my name could POSSIBLY something other than Chad (why don't you think of something that starts with a "T", since the initials in my screen name are "*t*m"), what choice do I have if I'm going to respond to you?
Ron White after getting arrested: "I had the right to remain silent, I just didn't have the self-discipline."

How do you feel about being called Ron White?
 
Ron White after getting arrested: "I had the right to remain silent, I just didn't have the self-discipline."

How do you feel about being called Ron White?

Way to butcher the joke. geez

"I had the right to remain silent, I did not have the ability."
 
Do you think about what you right? People get in arguments, assault/battery others (as simple as a push) everyday, that are never investigated as crimes. Why do you assume this case would have to be?

I never said an assault or potential assault (not reported to police) wouldn't get another player in trouble, I said it probably wouldn't get them dismissed, if they had no prior issues.

My point is, Barta said there was no code. Why would he say that if there was? Nobody would think it was wrong to have additional requirements. All Barta would of had to say is Anthony has agreed to certain internal requirements and there is a zero tolerance policy.

Don't act like your smarter/more cleaver than anyone else Duff, trust me, your not.
I think Duff is write, not wrong.
 
Here's what I want to know: How many fans didn't want to give Hubbard an Iowa BB chance because he was a felon? Because he didn't play the "right" way?
 

Latest posts

Top