Jackjoehawk
Member
Just don't understand it at all.
The more I thought about it the more it the more I'm ok with it. Coker had to get a rest and we all expected Mccall to score there would have been a good way to get him back in the fold....three weeks agoJust don't understand it at all.
The only problem I have is that Ferentz didn't go back to him after the fumble, particularly after the many mistakes other players make that don't result in a complete benching. Hard to believe we only have one scholarship back worthy of playing time. McCall I'm sure is down and confused about his role going forward. Ferentz should have gotten him another carry. If Ferentz treated Coker the same way he would have been benched after the ISU game.
He seriously can't win with some of you guys. McCall learned the ever important lesson that if you don't protect the ball, you don't play. Remember the reason he did so well in the first game? B/C they were doing the same thing with Coker. He will play next week, and he will play in the bowl, and he will be better over the next 3 years because of it.
The only problem I have is that Ferentz didn't go back to him after the fumble, particularly after the many mistakes other players make that don't result in a complete benching. Hard to believe we only have one scholarship back worthy of playing time. McCall I'm sure is down and confused about his role going forward. Ferentz should have gotten him another carry. If Ferentz treated Coker the same way he would have been benched after the ISU game.
You know what the reaction on this board would have been if McCall would have come back in and fumbled.... nuclear!