Yeah and that's where he's walking on egg shells here. I don't think doing it at the same time as Garzas woulda flown over too well either. That'd be taking something away from each of them I think. Unless Barta and Iowa had done something years ago the only way he avoids this is by delaying Garzas.I don't think Barta ever intended to piss anybody off, it's more a matter of incompetence rather than malice.
I mean, if the idea was brought to Barta by, let's say a donor or group of donors...how hard would it be to step back, take 10 minutes and ask yourself, "Well, 5 years ago we said we weren't going to retire Roy's number and I also said I don't really see us ever doing it...what would be the best way to go about this?"
Really the only answer to save face would have been to retire them both at the same time or do nothing at all. If you retire Marble now, it's just going to look like a token gesture. If you don't retire Marble and come out with new criteria to meet (that would obviously have to be written to fit Garza), you look like a total asshole.
Barta has painted himself into a corner yet again and left embarrassment as the only option for the Hawks. Just a total buffoon.
For the record, I don't think Marble's should be retired. No AA, no All Big Ten, etc. Yes he played at the same time as Glen Rice, but them's the breaks.
I'm fine with Marbles not being up there. I mean it's not something I think about unless the topic comes up. Would it bother me if they did? Not at all I'd be totally cool with that as well. But I have no dog in the race either like Devyn does.