Loved the autopsy article on the front page

Can you please tell me what a coach can do to win a close game when all your starters just give the other team the ball in the last 2 minutes of games and can't make a single shot? Do you think he should play the freshmen with no experience? Maybe but that would be tough for any coach to do. Oh yea, you think he should call a timeout. If Iowa was .500 in close games, Fran wouldhave 2 top 10 finishes and be talked about as the best iowa coach ever. Instead, he's terrible because he doesn't use a timeout at the end of games? Just horrible logic.
Agreed. Calling timeouts at the end of close games probably would have had the effect of icing his own team, plus forcing them to inbound the ball an extra time. This roster simply didn't have any of the kind of players who would have benefitted from calling timeouts during crunch time.
 
There's a difference between choosing not to take a timeout in the closing seconds of a one possession game and choosing not to take a timeout when a team is putting a significant run on you.

In the first instance, I don't think there's anything to debate because it's probably 50/50 in the coaching world as to whether or not you take a timeout at the end of a game.....and both methods seem to work equally well. Often times, the experience level of the personnel will dictate whether or not a timeout is warranted.

But Fran is the only coach I have ever seen in college basketball that refuses to call timeouts at any point in the first half when his teams are getting significant runs put on them. I watched nearly all the tournament games and time and time again you saw coaches take first half timeout(s) to quell runs by the opposition, and in most instances the timeout served the intended purpose. You can't win a game in the first half, but you can darn sure lose it if you don't get things under control.
 
Agreed. Calling timeouts at the end of close games probably would have had the effect of icing his own team, plus forcing them to inbound the ball an extra time. This roster simply didn't have any of the kind of players who would have benefitted from calling timeouts during crunch time.

Lol thats funny.
 
There's a difference between choosing not to take a timeout in the closing seconds of a one possession game and choosing not to take a timeout when a team is putting a significant run on you.

In the first instance, I don't think there's anything to debate because it's probably 50/50 in the coaching world as to whether or not you take a timeout at the end of a game.....and both methods seem to work equally well. Often times, the experience level of the personnel will dictate whether or not a timeout is warranted.

But Fran is the only coach I have ever seen in college basketball that refuses to call timeouts at any point in the first half when his teams are getting significant runs put on them. I watched nearly all the tournament games and time and time again you saw coaches take first half timeout(s) to quell runs by the opposition, and in most instances the timeout served the intended purpose. You can't win a game in the first half, but you can darn sure lose it if you don't get things under control.


I completely agree with this. I'm not sure why Fran doesn't use timeouts to stop runs.
 
Before we go calling the coaches abusive without proof it's in very poor taste to even put that out there. We got creamed by a very good Villanova team that we played ONLY because of our repeated late season collapses otherwise we may win 2 rounds. Let's not forget how bad Villanova beat Miami and I don't think people are questioning Laranauga's abuse.
 

Latest posts

Top