I'm just going to leave
this here.
So what this article told me this kid was Auburn bound until they did not retain the guy that was recruiting him. I believe in Lazard's case Rhoads was the guy that recruited him.
Also the article just reinforces what I thought, its about the coaching relationship's and Lazard has been around ISU coaches forever, he has gotten to know Rhoads and his staff for the past 4 years. If Rhoads is canned then yes he is probably gone.
I think in the case of Iowa, and losing a top football recruit and top basketball recruit, they had the misfortune of having 2 of the best programs ever come calling.
Bama can tell any recruit you have a better than 80% chance of playing in a national title every year. Kentucky, aside from the blip last year, same thing, there is a high probability you play in final 4's year in and year out.
Sounds like Iowa was 2nd to Kentucky for the Ulis kid, beating out an MSU program that goes to the NCAA tourney every year. Anybody but Bama for football and Kentucky for basketball and Iowa keeps/gets them both.
Will be interesting to see what Notre Dame does this year? Barely beating Purdue, a Purdue team many on here chalked up as a win for Iowa this year.
With their schedule they could finish 5-7 to 8-4
Stanford, would never a deny a kid a chance to go there, great campus, football atmosphere is a pretty much wine and cheese and laid back, went for ND-Stanford a couple of years ago and not loud at all, but education cannot beat it.
Maybe the kid switches, maybe he doesn't. But after reading some posts on here calling the kid stupid if he stays, makes me wonder if these same people were not on Twitter after the Ulis decision telling that kid he made a stupid choice. Damned if you do damned if you don't I guess. Most people have no idea why kids make the choices they do, and maybe, just maybe they weigh all things and make what they feel is the best decision for them.