KF said Fant is a specialist!

I'm saying that we can't run the dam ball because most of the team can't or isn't blocking.
Our run game is a smelly pile of dog crap because our run blocking by everyone is dog crap.
Nobody has that killer mentality. That I'm going to knock your dick into the dirt grit.
It's well we will work on it and clean some things up.
Screw that, you can only drink from the skulls of your enemy because you kicked the ever loving crap out of them.

As a former running back - blocking is not a problem. The Iowa backs have traditionally had terrible vision and/or decision-making skills. Wadley was an exception to that rule, but it's been since Tavian Banks before that that we've had a back that could read a block consistently.

Yes, the zone blocking outside run is dumb, but there are holes, big enough ones, for a couple seconds on each play. However, too often Iowa backs hit the line at 1000 mph with their heads down, don't dig in behind a good tackle block, or bounce outside but can't plant and turn up field.

Iowa backs lock onto a hole, look straight at it, and try to power through. If they are lucky, the gaurd seals off the pursuit backer and they break a first down. Watch Taylor, and that guy from NW. They are patient in the backfield, and turn on the juice right before a lineman turns their guy, run right up the lineman's back, and then lower the shoulder if necessary.

The best tool a rb has is not his legs. It his eyes and brain.
 
Let's see if I understand this

You ever notice Wisconsin seems to always have stud rb's yet at the next level they are just fairly average? Wisconsin makes them look like studs because they Excel and put emphasis on run blocking.

So, James White and Melvin Gordon are just average NFL backs, made to look better by Wisky's blocking.

But

Albert Young (pro rb) Shawn Greene (pro rb)
Drew Tate (got a shot at the NFL, all conference)
Might not have to put such a premium on everyone run blocking with a supporting cast like that.

AY & SG were such great pros, they didn't need blocking?

Really great argument there!
 
Let's see if I understand this



So, James White and Melvin Gordon are just average NFL backs, made to look better by Wisky's blocking.

But



AY & SG were such great pros, they didn't need blocking?

Really great argument there!

That's not what I was saying.
I'm saying with stud rb's they don't need as great of blocking by everyone.
Can't anyone see that every other team in the b10 from Illinois and Minnesota to Nebraska, Michigan, Wisconsin, all of them somehow all can get and have stud rb's, even ISU, but somehow we don't have any or can't get them?? That's bullshit and it's just a cover and an excuse for an underlying problem.
Only two things that could be scheme/design of plays or blocking.
Yeah it's tough to run when the d knows the play, but don't kid yourself we have been running those plays since..... forever.
Wadley covered up a flaw because he could see out of the side of his helmet and not get hit by any number of defensive players that were not being blocked. Then he was pretty darn fast once he hit open field.
 
Albert Young (pro rb) Shawn Greene (pro rb)
Drew Tate (got a shot at the NFL, all conference)
Might not have to put such a premium on everyone run blocking with a supporting cast like that.
Plus we actually had a run game back then.
And there's the rub. One of our best 'supporting cast" is sitting on the bench, in Noah Fant. I'll also point out the huge gap in talent between the 05/ 06 offensive line and the OL we have today. That's squarely on KF. Look no further than the OL, when trying to figure out why our run game is bad. It ain't got much to do with who Noah Fant is blocking down field. As bad as that group is, I'd spread both Fant and Hock out with 2 WRs and run out of a spread formation. Anything to get the 9 guys out of the box on run downs. That's what Fitz did in the 2nd half. Good coaches make adjustments.
For what it's worth, I like Hockenson as much as Fant in the receiving game. I'd be just as pissed if Hock was on the bench on 3rd down.
 
That's not what I was saying.
I'm saying with stud rb's they don't need as great of blocking by everyone.
Can't anyone see that every other team in the b10 from Illinois and Minnesota to Nebraska, Michigan, Wisconsin, all of them somehow all can get and have stud rb's, even ISU, but somehow we don't have any or can't get them?? That's bullshit and it's just a cover and an excuse for an underlying problem.
Only two things that could be scheme/design of plays or blocking.
Yeah it's tough to run when the d knows the play, but don't kid yourself we have been running those plays since..... forever.
Wadley covered up a flaw because he could see out of the side of his helmet and not get hit by any number of defensive players that were not being blocked. Then he was pretty darn fast once he hit open field.
Wadley helped cover up how poor this OL is. All of the TE blocking in the world isn't going to change that. KF (and his ego) thought he could grab an OC like Polesek to help out Brian, plug him into the OL coaching spot and make it work. We have 2 qualified OCs on the offensive coaching staff, trying to teach Brian how to do the job, while the OL coaching/results suffer. That's football.
 
Let's see if I understand this



So, James White and Melvin Gordon are just average NFL backs, made to look better by Wisky's blocking.

But



AY & SG were such great pros, they didn't need blocking?

Really great argument there!
Or...how bout this: If we had better RBs and a better OL, we wouldn't care that NF isn't a good blocker. But since that's not the case, we'll cut HIS playing time. That's only fair, after all. Why shouldn't NF get punished for lack of good RBs and OL?
 
Wadley helped cover up how poor this OL is. All of the TE blocking in the world isn't going to change that. KF (and his ego) thought he could grab an OC like Polesek to help out Brian, plug him into the OL coaching spot and make it work. We have 2 qualified OCs on the offensive coaching staff, trying to teach Brian how to do the job, while the OL coaching/results suffer. That's football.

I'm not saying our Ol isn't crapping up the run game.
I'm saying everyone is. As an entire offense.
What's really funny when you think about it is Morgan coaches ol and our ol is good. Morgan coaches dl and our DL is good.
Coincidence?
 
I'm not saying our Ol isn't crapping up the run game.
I'm saying everyone is. As an entire offense.
What's really funny when you think about it is Morgan coaches ol and our ol is good. Morgan coaches dl and our DL is good.
Coincidence?
Not a coincidence at all. Some men are just better teachers than others.
 
Not a coincidence at all. Some men are just better teachers than others.
Someone @RobHowe should write an article with our rushing rankings back when Morgan was coaching ol. Then what our defense rushing has been since he started coaching dl.
Because wasn't it about 7 years ago he switched??
Our run game has progressively gotten worse ever since. Which it took 4 of those 7 for all of his guys to graduate off of the ol. Figure at least a good 2 or 3.
 
Or...how bout this: If we had better RBs and a better OL, we wouldn't care that NF isn't a good blocker.

Sure.

But I'd rather see them help the passing game "be all it can be". If a defense has to respect that part of our offense, it will make ALL blockers better.

Many ways to make the offense better. None involve keeping your best playmaker out...
 
I don't understand that is what is happening. Iowa has done plently that isn't "old school". From swinging gates, empty set shotgun, passing more than running, passing with a huge lead...

Not having Fant out there isn't a matter of "doing it the way we always have..." it's just not intelligent.

I'll agree TJ has probably been a better target and Fant isn't the best run block TE on the team, but there's no sensible reason why he shouldn't be starting at WR the majority of the time then. Put your best players out on the field.

Their run scheme is "old school". That zone rushing has seen its better days. You can throw trick plays in and go for on 4th down a lot. But that doesnt take away the fact that your program is stuck in the 70s. You know it, I know it, and the country knows it,. The only people that dont know it work at Kinnick stadium
 
It means he’s completely lost his f’n mind


giphy.gif
 
Nope. You move him to receiver and don’t put Cooper or Groeneweg in the game. You move him around on the field, not to the sideline.
I've been so sick and tired of seeing those two small white guys out there... They aren't very good for one thing. For two if we are playing a 'big' formation put Fant out there like you said. Good lord. Teams know when Cooper is in we are 99.9% sure not going to him on it. Why on earth would you line up in a formation multiple times a game like that?
 

Here's my theory. Noah's concussion was worse than they want to say. Therefore he is playing less. He probably thinks he's fine and wants to play and they don't quite see it the same way. Maybe that is impacting how well he is practicing as well.

I think this is reasonable
 
Here's my theory. Noah's concussion was worse than they want to say. Therefore he is playing less. He probably thinks he's fine and wants to play and they don't quite see it the same way. Maybe that is impacting how well he is practicing as well.

I think this is reasonable
That's not how it works.
 
I'm not saying our Ol isn't crapping up the run game.
I'm saying everyone is. As an entire offense.
What's really funny when you think about it is Morgan coaches ol and our ol is good. Morgan coaches dl and our DL is good.
Coincidence?
Morgan lifted Iowa City West out of the doldrums almost from the moment he arrived around 1992 or so. West used to be the football doormat of the conference, and that was with the Hilgenberg brothers passing through.
 
Fant is a TE who can't block. Kirk is a 1970s coach and in the 1970s, TEs blocked. Not sure why this has anyone fired up. Seems like normal KF talk to me.

Shit KF doesn't even play WR who can't block. For him to play a TE, who is actually lined up next to the OL, who can't block is borderline crazy for Ferentz.
Yes, and Hock is a good blocker, hustles his @ss off and would run through a brick wall for the team. If we didnt have Hock, Fant would be out there 95% of the time.
 

Latest posts

Top