NorthKCHawk
Well-Known Member
Everyone always skips over the fact that the reason the offense is bad and the defense is so good is part of KF's overall philosophy. He believes in winning by coaching his players to not make mistakes and counting on the other team to be worse at executing. Tough D, tough running, control the clock, grind out a win 20 to 13. KF is not going to change his stripes now and I would not expect much of a rebirth on the offense.
I have said this before, but there is a direct connection between the success of the defense and the lack thereof on the offense. If KF switched to a spread attack and opened things up, they would turn the ball over more, score more, and control the ball less. All of that would have a negative impact upon the defense. Phil Parker is a very good DC, but he is the beneficiary of teams knowing that they don't need to score 30 points to beat Iowa. So, they game plan accordingly. Iowa is good at forcing teams to play Iowa's style.
Given how few plays Iowa runs on offense compared to spread teams, being the 60th best offense would actually be pretty good.
I have said this before, but there is a direct connection between the success of the defense and the lack thereof on the offense. If KF switched to a spread attack and opened things up, they would turn the ball over more, score more, and control the ball less. All of that would have a negative impact upon the defense. Phil Parker is a very good DC, but he is the beneficiary of teams knowing that they don't need to score 30 points to beat Iowa. So, they game plan accordingly. Iowa is good at forcing teams to play Iowa's style.
Given how few plays Iowa runs on offense compared to spread teams, being the 60th best offense would actually be pretty good.