I disagree that motivation isn't a job of the coaches. there are many different ways to motivate and its a coaches job to know the best way to motivate each individual player
coaches are there to push buttons but if a player needs a coach to get them motivated then they are weak minded and lack pride in doing their best. i believe a kid that really wants to succeed doesnt need anything more than their own will to do their best. it is the coaches jobs to put them in the best position to win. i look at it kind of like athletes that take greenies to get up for games. my theory is if you cant get your adrenaline going for competition on your own without outside means then you are not that competitive and shouldnt be competing.I disagree that motivation isn't a job of the coaches. there are many different ways to motivate and its a coaches job to know the best way to motivate each individual player
the comment that worries me is the posters putting it on the coaches to get players fired up on gameday. i was a college athlete and played sports throughout hs (4 sports) and now i coach. the responsibility of the coach is to prepare the player. if the player isnt emotionally there for the game it is the players fault. i never needed a coach to fire me up and if i wasnt fired up nothing a coach said could do it. it is personal pride and desire to do your best. plus people put too much into outward emotion. players can be calm on the outside and really emotionally ready. seems like everyone wants the rah rah players. those guys are annoying and they are also usually the first ones to complain when things dont work out.
Are these mutually exclusive duties?
I submit that it is good to have Hawkeyes in the NFL. But I wonder if a closer look is necessary at the TYPE of Hawkeyes who are in the NFL.
How many Iowa RBs are there in the NFL? WRs? "Athletes"? QBs?
I see a preponderance of linemen, TEs, LBs, and a few kickers, punters, and DBs.
If the coaching staff didn't destroy their own RBs in practice, how many Iowa RBs could there be/have been in the NFL?
Why so few QBs and WRs?
Why so few skill players in general?
So I clarify and then reiterate: Is KF's job to win football games or to send linemen, TEs, and LBs to the NFL?
To answer the OP's question, in my opinion, it is our head f b coach's job to win football games.
Given the two choices you directed us to.
Bielma gets rid of staff that he thinks doesn't think is performing well enough and he adjusts his offense and defense to the players he has.
Bert Biels did not get rid of his staff, they left for what they saw as greener pastures, for whatever reason.Bielma and Wisconsin doesn't have a problem competing do they? Use the Minnesota example if you like but if Minnesota gets a good coach, Minnesota will be back, just like Illinois.
Bielma gets rid of staff that he thinks doesn't think is performing well enough and he adjusts his offense and defense to the players he has. Ferentz is loyal to his staff, regardless of how they are performing and values friendship to these coaches over the health of the Iowa program. KF knows one way and only one way to play football and that is not going to change, regardless of the outcomes. Kind of like Tom Davis...Davis knew one way and only way and that is how they played. It didn't matter if an opposing team had a dunkfest or hit 20 threes during a game, Davis simply would not change ANYTHING that he did. KF is just like him. He is not about to change anything and it doesn't matter if every team in the B1G knows exactly what he is going to do...he will just go ahead and do it, that is the only way KF knows. KF is basically the Tom Davis of Iowa football.