Imagine believing the NFL of 20 years ago is the same as today. Psssst it isn't. He's not playing anywherePunt returner... Wes Welker. Similarities. Charlie is a bit faster in the 40. Nobody thought he'd make it. Wasn't drafted. Jones is getting drafted...late
Career 50 259 3,069 11.8 21 79 559 7.1 2 Rec Yds Avg TD Att Yds Avg TD Season Team Class Pos GP Receiving Rushing 2000 Texas Tech FR RB 12 26 334 12.8 0 6 72 12.0 1 2001 Texas Tech SO WR 11 50 582 11.6 5 15 97 6.5 0 2002 Texas Tech JR WR 14 86 1,054 12.3 7 31 244 7.9 0 2003 Texas Tech SR WR 13 97 1,099 11.3 9 27 146 5.4 1
Why, you think NFL players are bigger, faster, and better than 20 years ago? Pssst, there are not.Imagine believing the NFL of 20 years ago is the same as today. Psssst it isn't. He's not playing anywhere
From a stat perspective probably not, but I got to think losing to Iowa has to eat at him some.
Charlie isn’t playing in the NFL but he would’ve made us a team with a good shot at the West this year.
I'd be curious to know some stats on it. I know that when it comes to LBs nowadays they are smaller then they were in the 90s/2000s. They used to be all over 245-250 to play the run. Nowadays there's a lot of them in the 220s-230s built for speed.Why, you think NFL players are bigger, faster, and better than 20 years ago? Pssst, there are not.
I'd be curious to know some stats on it. I know that when it comes to LBs nowadays they are smaller then they were in the 90s/2000s. They used to be all over 245-250 to play the run. Nowadays there's a lot of them in the 220s-230s built for speed.
WRs Dbs may be a smidge faster but they aren't noticeably bigger. Olines/Dlines seem about the same. DEs are smaller now then back then if anything.
Saw that and absolutely loved it.Did you guys catch the moment where DeJean reached out to offer Charlie a hand up from the turf? Campbell stepped in and grabbed Dejean's arm saying "No".
From a stat perspective probably not, but I got to think losing to Iowa has to eat at him some.
I'd be curious to know some stats on it. I know that when it comes to LBs nowadays they are smaller then they were in the 90s/2000s. They used to be all over 245-250 to play the run. Nowadays there's a lot of them in the 220s-230s built for speed.
WRs Dbs may be a smidge faster but they aren't noticeably bigger. Olines/Dlines seem about the same. DEs are smaller now then back then if anything.
I didn't look for anything on linebackers. I did see that linemen weight has gone from ~270 average in the 80s to 300+ in the 2000s.
Here's wide receivers:
https://www.footballperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/wr-height-1024x694.png
Doesn't mean he couldn't play somewhere. Wes Welker is 5'9". Etc. Etc. I have no idea to forecast NFL translation. I thought Nick Bell was going to be the greatest NFL running back in history.
I just was curious to see about size. I'm 6'. And at times have been a fairly 'big fella'. Was on the sidelines before an NFL game one time. They're all ogres. Even the punters are like 14 feet tall. Baseball is kind of the same. You don't realize they're all way taller than average, because they're all tall. David Eckstein looked like a 'shrimp' at 5'7" cause the other guys are all like 6'4".
Why, you think NFL players are bigger, faster, and better than 20 years ago? Pssst, there are not.
I would imagine someone did match the offer. Purdue was still the right for for him as a receiver, and his Pop Warner teammate from way back is the QB.Here is another thought. Let's say Iowa boosters matched the offer and Charlie stayed at Iowa.