Denverhawk1
Well-Known Member
F#ck no.
comparing the clown unis to ronald always gets likesRunning game ... huge advantage Iowa. Actually I hope they keep spouting off because it can only light a fire under some of our out-of-state players. It's probably a 6 or 7 point Iowa advantage this year on a neutral field, so -3 at Lames makes sense.
Let's concentrate on Wyoming first then open a can of whoop ass on little bro dressed as creepy clowns.
He is the next in line of "great" ISU Qbs. Since Seneca, we have heard about how Austin Flynn was going to be better than Drew Tate. Bret Meyer was the next big thing. Then it was Austen Arnaud is better than Stanzi. Then he lost his job to the next great QB, Tiller. then Steele Jantz was a heisman hopeful. He lost his job to Barnett. Who then lost his job to Sam Richardson. He never did anything, but then Lanning was just "too good" to keep off the field. Now we have Park, who is "almost as good as Mayfield and Rudolph."
I think they have a tendency to over-react. In 2 years, we will be laughing at the Stanley vs. Park debate.
He is the next in line of "great" ISU Qbs. Since Seneca, we have heard about how Austin Flynn was going to be better than Drew Tate. Bret Meyer was the next big thing. Then it was Austen Arnaud is better than Stanzi. Then he lost his job to the next great QB, Tiller. then Steele Jantz was a heisman hopeful. He lost his job to Barnett. Who then lost his job to Sam Richardson. He never did anything, but then Lanning was just "too good" to keep off the field. Now we have Park, who is "almost as good as Mayfield and Rudolph."
I think they have a tendency to over-react. In 2 years, we will be laughing at the Stanley vs. Park debate.
I'd love to call BS on this article...and would have in Hayden's day. Kirk's record against the clones makes it a different discussion.
Agree. I wonder if any other coach has lost as many times against ISU than Kirk? I assume no, since if your team is bad enough to lose to ISU, your school probably doesn't keep that coach around very long.
That's because it's their Super Bowl, or something like that.I'm always nervous about this one. I think we should win, but it's rarely easy.
Kirk's first two losses to them were when he was trying to re-stack the cupboard after finding it bare after Hayden. Then we choked a couple away the next two years in painful losses. And he was 0-4 right off the bat. Since then, he's been mostly dialed in on winning it.
That's because it's their Super Bowl, or something like that.