greghammel
Well-Known Member
Don't forget the Wake Forest game... we were blowing them out and gave it away too.
We were up 18 at Wake. God I want that game back. They suck.
The corner is not being turned. Our GPS doesn't even have the corner on the display yet.
Not sure how you can say the corner is not being turned. The players look like they are having fun. Players are improving. We are passing the ball better. It is baby steps but we are improving and we are turning the corner. Especially when you look at where the program has been.
Then we're turning the corner on a tricycle. This team is still 2 years away from even competeing for the top third of the big ten. So rather than getting into a semantic slap fight over what "The corner" is, I will admit they are improving, but I will not admit they will be competitive in the Big 10, because they have trouble competeing with Big West teams.
They have a Pomeroy Rating that's right there at 2nd in the Summit, so I'll stick by my in-season analysis rather than someone's preseason picks before they've seen a game.
Iowa Football was predicted to either win or place 2nd in the Big Ten too.... we know how that worked out. Actual results are better than predictions/guesses.
I found this stat more embarrassing than encouraging
I agree. With our schedule our record isn't saying much. Other than we still suck at round ball.
Want to wager money on that? I guarantee Iowa will be competitive in the Big 10. They aren't going to wow anyone, but they aren't terrible. They'll win a few they shouldn't. Lose a few they shouldn't. And everything in between that. What is it with you? Do you ever talk about or say anything positive?
I don't really think I'm being negative, but I'm being realistic. They will not be competitive in the Big 10. We may have improved a bit, but most of the teams in the Big 10 have improved much more.
Here's your bet, if Iowa wins more 6 games in the Big 10, I'll leave forever, and take my "negativity" with me.
I don't really think I'm being negative, but I'm being realistic. They will not be competitive in the Big 10. We may have improved a bit, but most of the teams in the Big 10 have improved much more.
Here's your bet, if Iowa wins more 6 games in the Big 10, I'll leave forever, and take my "negativity" with me.
So if we win 6 games in the B10, is that not being competitive?
That would be a 33% winning percentage. What exactly would a team losing 2/3rds of their games be competeing for? The only thing Iowa is competeing for is 7th place.
People seem to mistake liking the team with the team being talented. Yeah, the coach has a pulse, and the players don't look like their parents died anymore, but God bless 'em, they just are not as good as the other teams.
To me, competing is being is just about every game, and winning more than they're losing.Losing two-thirds of our games does not fit the definition.Your definition of being competitive must be different than most people's including Fran, who has said over and over that we will compete in the B10. I would consider a team to be competitive if they go 6-12 and lose a lot of close games being a very young team playing in the best conf in America. I think you're assuming everyone here is talking about competing for a B10 title, which is not the case.