M
mysteron
Guest
(no snickering)
(no snickering)
No, bc if we beat wisc and neb (I honestly don't think we will, we can't stop the run) then we should have beat an underrated Minnesota team, and there is no excuse on the planet for why we lose to ISU and Maryland. If we beat wisc and nebby, we should be undefeated playing OSU for the B1G title and playoff hopes.. Plain and simple.
I've seen both Wisconsin and Nebraska this year in Evanston. Both of those teams will exploit our LBs and with Rudock at QB, we won't be able to keep the games close. Wisconsin only lost to NU because their QB played awful and they threw 4 picks, but Gordon just went off on them. The fact that we didn't score well over 40 against that pathetic Illinois defense makes me pretty worried.
(no snickering)
I think so. Cause those last two teams are far better than the other 3 we lost to.
And it would clinch a berth in the Conf Champ.
I think there are 3 camps but you're in the majority camp.
Camp 1) No it wouldn't
Camp 2) It would feel good but highlight how we underachieved this year
Camp 3) All is forgiven. (majority camp)
Something to think about though. Say we split the games. We will end up with the SAME end-of-season record we had last year, despite an easier schedule and more overall team maturity. AND we would've only beaten one team with a winning record.
That Iowa State loss is an albatross (I bust out my rhymes from time to time)
If it were not for the terrible targeting call on Lomax a lot could be different.