LG210
Well-Known Member
I respect most of you guys posts about the arrogance and stuff from LSU, you can interpret it however you want, it aggrivates me as well when players celebrate for doing their jobs, but most schools now allow them to play that way because it keeps them intense and into everyplay of the game, Kirk F, is not that type of coach, he is a disciplinarian MOST other coaches in the country or not...that does not make it wrong or right, it's just everyones opinions. Some of the issues I have are when people say we could have, should have won that game we are better than them.....that's bull and you know it. Iowa only stayed close because 1. Defense played well....but you still gave up 220 yards rushing.....2. Kickoff return to the 4 . Take away the int for 6 and the kickoff return and you did absaloutley nothing on offense.....so it really was pure domination outside of 2 plays. Oh and the refs ...yes they were horrible, the non fumble call(play blown dead) ******** ball was out as soon as there was contact, and the overturner fumble call....no way was that an incomplete pass.
LSU was the better team, but you can't start picking and choosing plays (or entire units, in the case of "defense") to vaporize from the game and claim domination. You could vaporize a few LSU plays and Iowa wins easy, too.
Also, that most certainly was an incomplete pass. In addition to the fact that the replay showed the QB's arm moving forward, the fact that the ball flew several (if not 10 or 15) yards in the direction opposite that of the defender's hit is pretty conclusive. That doesn't happen unless the QB's arm is moving forward.
Canzeri undoubtedly fumbled, however, and the refs blew that call.