I think Ferentz is a good, but not elite coach. After two decades, his strengths and weaknesses are well known within the fan base. The style of play is established. Ferentz's biggest strengths aren't exactly things that people see (player development, technical fundamentals) and some of his weaknesses are in plain sight on game day (lack of innovation in X's and O's). Since the weaknesses are easier to see, there is a part of the fan base that concludes that he must be a bad football coach because that's what they see. I don't think the issue is the amount of wins and losses as much as it is about aesthetics. If you looked at the last decade, there are mostly 7-8 win season with a couple of 10 win seasons and a 4 win season sprinkled in. I think the portion of the fan base that is anti-Ferentz would actually be fine with that if Iowa was annually a top 30 team on offense and played a more aggressive style of defense. The win loss record might be the same, but it would look/feel better to them. For some people, it's more about how they get there than where they end up. Sports are entertainment so I understand that.