hawkeyebob62
Well-Known Member
I think there are two reasons, only one of which is the fault of the NCAA.
1) Enormous guaranteed rookie contracts
2) Having over 40 bowl games and effectively no qualification criteria. It makes all bowls, even the non-CFP big ones, seem lame-o. If there were only the main six bowls and not everyone and their brother got to play in them I think it’s make players change their minds in some cases because only the theoretical top 12 teams would get to play.
Yep. When 8 or 9 teams from a conference (or maybe even 10 in some years) go "bowling", it cheapens the crap out the "bowl system". Real simple: 32-team playoff, with first two rounds at host/higher-seed schools. Eliminate CCG games for p5, guarantee each P5 TWO entries, each G5 one entry, and GUARANTEE one of the service academies ("Commander In Chief" trophy winner), which makes 16 teams; let the "committee" pick the other 16. One stipulation: no more than ONE additional team from ANY conference, above the alloted/slotted spots.
NO guarantee for ANY independent/unaffiliated teams. And let P5 conferences figure out how their 2 "guarantee teams" are selected, let G5 have CCG if they so desire, to let them get a little "hype". If more teams come from certain conferences, so be it. Let conferences "nominate" beyond their "guarantee" teams, and committee can say "Yea" or "Nay". But stop, already, with seventh-place teams--I don't CARE what conference!--playing one single second after Thanksgiving.