just like him, you suggesting we wouldn't do something is nothing but conjecture.I really HATE to seem to agree with Fryowa on ANYTHING.....but.....did you watch the Hawks this year? All that cool stuff that you suggest....its called a unicorn. Lockness monster. Easter Bunny. The same qb who couldnt win 4 games with drives and gift wrapped one of MSU's scores, the same return man who made it possible for MSU to even be in the game, the same team going against the #1 defense in the nation.....really? I mean...maybe....but....really? Again, pleased with the outcome but...i disagree that we win after MSU catches that TD pass (if they had).
And, the QB in his last two games led a game winning drive, and was the offensive reason we won yesterday...including a drive to get 3 on the second to last possession yesterday.
What he did yesterday was everybit the equivalent of what Tate did against LSU with no running game. Unlike Tate he didn't get a hail mary chance, was without a top playmaker, and statistically eclipsed Tate at 21-31, 3 tds with NO running game. Additionally, pretty accomplished players in his face on MANY of those 31 attempts. I understand there are things jock sniffers do not understand...namely improvement. Thinking Iowa wouldn't have gotten a 6th scoring drive of the game is just pessimistic.