GravyJones
Well-Known Member
Fuller played 185 minutes in non-conference games that is an average of 14 minutes. When Big Ten started he played 546 minutes-30 minutes a game.
Wasn't Fuller nursing an injury in the early part of the season?
Fuller played 185 minutes in non-conference games that is an average of 14 minutes. When Big Ten started he played 546 minutes-30 minutes a game.
Wasn't Fuller nursing an injury in the early part of the season?
This team is not very good. But think how awful this team would be if Lickliter was still the coach. Basabe & Cartwright are huge upgrades over Larson & Brust.
Fuller was gone regardless of the coach. It is encouraging that the two best players on the team are Fran's recruits.
One thing I will say, Iowa could absolutely use Fuller on this team. Would the team have 5 more wins? No. But he'd definitely help out and I wish he would have stuck it out.
But that's done and over. If it means Iowa got Basabe because Fuller left, then it's a good trade (although I think it was a Larson-Basabe trade).
12 and 8 is your best player? Really? That isn't saying much.
Actually, it is embarrassing. McCaffery's first two recruits are better than anyone Lickliter recruited in three years.
Quotes, like the following, drove me nuts about Lickliter. Thank God, McCaffery doesn't have the same attitude.
"The recruits that we've targeted that we feel like are going to be able to compete have got to go through some tough times. We're not recruiting an All-Big Ten player to Iowa their freshman year. If we do, great, if we can find him. But realistically, what we've had to do is recruit players who can develop into that."
Fuller would be a better player right now. Basabe certainly has more upside. Remember that Fuller could shoot the ball a little bit and was a stronger, more physical player. He would have fared better against Minnesota's zone than Basabe, IMHO.
"I'm gonna have to sort of disagree with you, yeah." Basabe has a much better shot and better range than Fuller. Basabe has proven that he can hit the 15 footer consistently. Don't ever remember getting that from Aaron.
Fuller could hit 3 pointers. Basabe has probably a better mid range game. Inside I think they are similar. This one is close. On offense I think they are a wash.
Overall, I'll take Basabe because of his D because of his shot blocking ability.
Fuller from 3 point land:
2008-2009: 22/74 29.7%
2009-2010: 6/30 20%
Obviously not very high percentages, but I can't recall Mel even attempting a 3 point shot this year. So I would still give the edge to Fuller as far as a 3 point shooter.
Mel knows he more than likely will not hit from downtown so he does not shoot it. Fuller shot a terrible percentage from 3 point land and still chucked them up. 3-point ability should be a non-factor in aruging who is a better player between Fuller and Basabe.
Obviously not very high percentages, but I can't recall Mel even attempting a 3 point shot this year. So I would still give the edge to Fuller as far as a 3 point shooter.