You're right. It's funny how 35 minutes can fool you into thinking the officiating didn't hurt you. But the last 5 minutes was straight up football. A team could hold Garza to 0 points if they were allowed to do that for 40 minutes. Coaches being allowed to work the refs should be completely eliminated from the game. If an official has an agenda, it's going to happen whether the coach complains or not. And it's not like there are times where the refs are trying their hardest to do their best, but then a coach yells at them and they decide to focus even harder to do an even better job. For a coach, it's never about calling it fair. It's about calling it their way. The best coaches in the nation are actually just the best coaches at working the refs. What a ridiculous concept, but its true. Just eliminate it already.
My take on the reffing from last night: not any more lopsided towards the home team than usual, Iowa could have overcome it with better play.
But your idea of not allowing coaches to address officials is an interesting one. Who is primarily in charge of setting up
rules/regulations governing play? Coaches, or ADs representing on behalf of their coaches. So they set things up so that coaches have maximum control over what is going on. Lots of timeouts, incredibly lax enforcement of the coaching box (which was expanded 10 feet in recent years)...
...basically unlimited ability to work the officials.
But who else does it benefit? Do you think the players like being hyper-manipulated throughout a game, or would they rather be given the freedom to make their own decisions? As a fan, do you enjoy coaches influencing refs? Games where the last 5 minutes of game time takes 40 minutes of actual time because of all the stoppages so coaches can tell their players exactly what to do?
What if coaches were not allowed to leave their seat? Would that negatively impact the player or fan experience?
What if coaches could only address the lead official, and only during stoppages in play? Would you feel like that detracted from the product?
What if basketball eliminated live-ball timeouts, and drastically reduced the overall timeouts? You trap a guy in the corner: he can no longer get bailed out by a TO. The coach wants to take a TO to draw up a last second play after an opponent make: sorry, no stoppages, it is on your players. Would the game really get worse for anyone but the coaches? I think players and fans would embrace it.