How did the 2 point conversion fail?
Just got home from Mad Town and that would be a good place to start. Have no idea what has been discussed in 51 pages of this thread, but
why did Stanley not reach to ball over the goal line when he got close? It's a dead ball situation, he had nothing to lose by reaching because a fumble can't hurt him there.
Reach the ball and break the plane.
The long TD to Tracy itself, while providing needed points, was a bit unfortunate because it put a tired defense right back on the field. But not a whole lot you could do there, only hope the defense gets one more stop. If we get our hands back on that ball Duncan is winning it with a field goal.
Stanley brought heart today, but had a costly, costly turnover. We were driving when he fumbled the center exchange, even one of Kirk's beloved fg's would have helped. Not to be.
Where was Wisconsin's feared pass rush the last three quarters? May have been our offensive line's best job of pass blocking against a good defense all season.
Not going for the onside kick was the right call. Too early. Needed to get a stop. I didn't like burning the second time out on second and short. They were going to get a first. I would have preferred burning it on the next first down then hoping they got off schedule.
Kirk was clearly playing for a field goal on the first scoring drive. Like Iowa State, you want to get points early in a hostile road environment. But that felt like a moral victory for Wisconsin in that situation. First the strip and recovery, then the defensive holding immediately after. It was the 2018 punt return muff in reverse and we couldn't take advantage.
The running into the kicker, instead of roughing, was unfortunate. We could have taken those three points off the board and been in good position for seven (actually eight) with a fifteen yard roughing.
Why couldn't we stop Taylor? They killed us in time of possession.
Kirk was outcoached big time today.
That is all for now.