Greg Davis staying?!?

It's pretty simple: Good QB = Good in football.

We had a bad one. Plain and simple. If a better one shows up, we will have a decent team.

Look at the NFL. Bad QBs = bad teams. Same in college. A&M might have the Heisman winner and is doing pretty well in the tough SEC. They struggled last year with a different QB in the b12.

Just sayin.

IMO, most defenses in the SEC would have tough times with Big 12-like spread offenses.
It also seems more than one SEC offense wouldn't be able to keep up with points...

Sidenote: Notre Dame vs. Alabama or LSU? Yawn. And you thought last year's BCS Championship game was boring..... BTW, the weakness of Notre Dame's defense is the secondary, so Notre Dame's defense would also have problems with Big 12--like spread offenses.

Let Alabama, LSU, or Notre Dame play, for example, West Virginia and see what happens.
 
Last edited:
It's pretty simple: Good QB = Good in football.

We had a bad one. Plain and simple. If a better one shows up, we will have a decent team.

Look at the NFL. Bad QBs = bad teams. Same in college. A&M might have the Heisman winner and is doing pretty well in the tough SEC. They struggled last year with a different QB in the b12.

Just sayin.

Wrong, so wrong even a clown knows you are wrong, Vandy was a good QB his Soph and JR year and all of a sudden he stinks as a Sr. that is all coaching.
 
IMO, most defenses in the SEC would have tough times with Big 12-like spread offenses.
It also seems more than one SEC offense wouldn't be able to keep up with points...

Sidenote: Notre Dame vs. Alabama or LSU? Yawn. And you thought last year's BCS Championship game was boring..... BTW, the weakness of Notre Dame's defense is the secondary, so Notre Dame's defense would also have problems with Big 12--like spread offenses.

Let Alabama, LSU, or Notre Dame play West Virginia and see what happens.



Please tell me you're not serious? The same big bad West Virginia that had to eek by a very mediocre Clown team this past weekend, and one that's dropped 5 of their last 6???! Don't bogart......keep passin'
 
IMO, most defenses in the SEC would have tough times with Big 12-like spread offenses.
It also seems more than one SEC offense wouldn't be able to keep up with points...

Sidenote: Notre Dame vs. Alabama or LSU? Yawn. And you thought last year's BCS Championship game was boring..... BTW, the weakness of Notre Dame's defense is the secondary, so Notre Dame's defense would also have problems with Big 12--like spread offenses.

Let Alabama, LSU, or Notre Dame play West Virginia and see what happens.


Umm, All 3 of those teams would beat West Virginia like a drum? Seriously, they were blown out by Texas Tech and lost to TCU at home.
 
If you can't see that this offensive scheme was hopelessly futile, compared to just below average from KOK in most years, then I'm afraid you're a lost cause.

The scheme was different. The gameplan was not. If you don't understand that then you're a lost cause.
 
It's pretty simple: Good QB = Good in football.

We had a bad one. Plain and simple. If a better one shows up, we will have a decent team.

Look at the NFL. Bad QBs = bad teams. Same in college. A&M might have the Heisman winner and is doing pretty well in the tough SEC. They struggled last year with a different QB in the b12.

Just sayin.

A&M was led by an NFL 1st round QB last year.
 
Wrong, so wrong even a clown knows you are wrong, Vandy was a good QB his Soph and JR year and all of a sudden he stinks as a Sr. that is all coaching.

In fact, I would argue he really wasn't that good his soph more in the few games he played, and cashed in on a lot of TDs against the likes of Pitt, ULM and Indiana in a decent Jr year.
 
The scheme was different. The gameplan was not. If you don't understand that then you're a lost cause.

Sure, the overall gameplan was still conservative, and that probably won't change. But you can still have a better offense than this year's and stay conservative (see: 13 years of KOK).
 
I ran into his wife at the senior center and she says absolutely not. The cold weather is very bad for her arthritis and much better early bird specials in Texas.
 
You can't say the fall from 27 TD to 7 TD all on the QB

It was the same QB

The Difference was the OC

You discount the consistent neutering of QB's in their Sr. year under Ferentz. By the time QB's are Sr.'s KF has them so scared to turn the ball over that they also don't make plays that they used to make in previous seasons. Tate, Stanzi, JVB.
 
You discount the consistent neutering of QB's in their Sr. year under Ferentz. By the time QB's are Sr.'s KF has them so scared to turn the ball over that they also don't make plays that they used to make in previous seasons. Tate, Stanzi, JVB.

Stanzi was a better QB his senior year. His defense wasn't as good though which is why all those close games Iowa won in 2009 turned to losses in 2010. Put Pat Angerer on that 2010 team and you have another BCS bowl team.
 
I know this cannot be true because that third world stinkhole Marshalltown does not have the capacity to domicile a big-time Hawk donor. If said person had enough money to be a big time Hawk donor, said person would not be feasting at Le Tremont nor residing in Marshallgutter.


I am truly offended by this. I'll be happy to provide a few suggestions on where you can shove it, if you so desire.
 
Stanzi was a better QB his senior year. His defense wasn't as good though which is why all those close games Iowa won in 2009 turned to losses in 2010. Put Pat Angerer on that 2010 team and you have another BCS bowl team.

Better get Eds, too.
 
You discount the consistent neutering of QB's in their Sr. year under Ferentz. By the time QB's are Sr.'s KF has them so scared to turn the ball over that they also don't make plays that they used to make in previous seasons. Tate, Stanzi, JVB.

I am dumber for having read this.
 

Latest posts

Top