For a rambling, didn't-make-much-sense, contradict-itself-throughout post, you also managed to make it about two paragraphs too long. Kudos.
Let me paraphrase so you can understand.
Was it because of a decline in family units....No, that's always been a problem, even in Iowa.
Was it because of the fact they were black...No, white's have done this as well.
Was it because of the Great Society? No, the GS was an attempt to fix an existing race/opportunity problem.
Was it the girls fault? Stupidity and Naivete are not a reason to get gang raped.
Was the boycott because of the players demanding to know why the suspension? Apparently yes and for many not because of the suspension for what occurred.
Did the coach support the boycott? Yes, but did he know everything? Hmmm.
Does this subject evict a lot of emotion on both sides? Yes do to life's experiences on both sides of the fence.
Do some on here back track from statements? yes, happens a lot especially when called out. I've been wrong a few times too.
Are people uncomfortable with the subject? of course. My guess some would like to see Mary Beth Haglin go to jail. Others think of the minor student...that sly dog. This like the MN case will always bring out emotion. What is different is that it is much harder to ignore such things with current technology.
My suspicion is that those who have been posting on either side are particularly close to this type of subject either as a victim/close to a victim or as the accused or close to the accused.