False. Since they fired Pelini they have not had a decent coach. They had what they thought were decent coaches. They took gambles on them. You can't use Solich and Pelini as examples of good coaches taking that Job because Nebraska wasn't a dog shit program just yet.
Look at Riley's record before Nebraska and what he's done since he got canned. Tell me anything about that guy that says, "decent coach."
Scott Frost had a short period of success at a non P5 school and it's flamingly obvious now that he's in WAY over his head in terms of coaching ability.
I am in your camp. The kids being recruited today weren't even alive the last time Nebraska was good. What is amazing is the extent to which we have seen almost death spiral like activities out of "blue blood" programs. USC, Michigan, Miami, Nebraska, Tennessee, Florida State and Texas. These programs dominated, absolutely dominated the 90's and early part of the 2000's and they all suck ass now.
The problem is if you blow the hire on ONE coach, you set your program back years. Those programs routinely embarrassed the ever living shit out of Iowa. I'm not definitively saying Iowa is better than all of them and yeah, I remember the HawkSlayer Bowl, but Iowa has achieved substantial parity with those teams. Those programs have all turned into revolving door coaching stops that never have time to forge an identity and every "splash hire" they make ends up landing like a turd in a punch bowl.
Here's the issue. To be competitive at the highest levels today, you better have (a) a QB that is either a first round talent or at least a guy who is going to get a sniff in the league because if you ain't got that, you are boned, (b) at least two ridiculous WRs, (c) two or maybe three guys in that front (six) seven on defense who are going to be taken in the first two rounds of the draft, (d) two DBs who are going to be picked in the first four rounds of the draft to at least make a half assed attempt at covering the freak WRs on the other team, and (e) a coach who can call games AND keep the team and egos together. And those aforementioned stars only give a shit about playing somewhere they can win a title, they're competitive, they don't want a pat on the back and told "great year" after going 7-5.
These programs are so hyperfocused on being amazing that they skip the preliminary step of getting a foothold established. The first new coach comes in, say RichRod or Solich or Jimbo. Maybe they have some success for a few years, but by year 3 the natives are restless. The seat gets hot. They start choking. Recruiting slips because the kids don't know if the coach will be there. Bam. Your program is ruined. Next, they get another guy, maybe he does okay, but it's still not good enough. Now, they start swinging for the fences on the next guy. Nick or Dabo ain't walking through that door. It's just a total spiral down. Michigan might have an okay record, but holy shit they look like they are playing a different sport when they line up against OSU. 15 years ago that served as a de facto play in game for the natty.
Texas will eventually right the ship, maybe USC will as well if they still care about football, but if you ain't got the right coach, you're toast and I think a bunch of those "always in the preseason top 25 teams" are just completely and utterly boned. You ain't getting the right coach unless you have a pretty ideal set of facts or you find a young guy, take a gamble and he is loyal. Ferentz is a good example of that, and Campbell is as well (but to what extent we don't know).