DesMoinesHawki
Well-Known Member
We all agree Kirk is a good guy; did a nice job rebuilding the program post-Hayden; gave us lots of excitement the past 15 seasons ... and it's not that I don't "support Kirk," I just think it is time for the University to take a hard look at the state of the program. Sixteen seasons at one school is unheard of in today's "me" society. Coaches bolt for the next paycheck and leave programs in the dust in trying to find a replacement.
Kirk has been loyal to Iowa, and in turn, Iowa has been VERY loyal to Kirk in terms of his compensation and contract. I want Kirk to win. We all want Kirk to win. Questioning the state of the program does not mean we are all tossing Kirk under the bus. It means, as in life, if something isn't working then you need to take a long look at what the problem is and how can we fix it.
Three years ago Kirk made staff changes. And right now, it looks like some of those staff changes are not contributing to our program getting back to where it can be and should be. We are a realistic fanbase; we are a patient fanbase; we are a patient university (for the most part). With Iowa's budgets, coaching salaries, facilities, fanbase, and support, this should be a program that regularly wins 8 games a season with a 9 or 10-win season every few years. We aren't Northwestern, Minnesota, Purdue, Indiana, Illinois ... With our investment in salaries and facilities, and a loyal fanbase... expecting at least 8 wins a season is not asking too much (in my opinion).
When you label yourself "lil 'ol Iowa" ... saying we can't get good recruits to come to lil 'ol Iowa, saying we can't compete with the "big boys" ... well you play into that thinking. There is no reason we can't bring in good recruits. Remember Vivian Stringer? She brought in recruits from all over the country and eventually took us to the Final 4. Those same top recruits thought enough of Coach Stringer, Iowa, the university, the facilities ... to call Iowa City home for 4 seasons. Players will go anywhere ... if you have the right coach in place that can convince them to come to Iowa City.
Sure, we aren't go to land 5 stars from the southeast ... But why can't we land more 4 and 5 stars from the Midwest? Is the weather in Iowa City any different than the weather in Lincoln? In South Bend? In Ann Arbor? Are our facilities that much below ND, Michigan, Nebraska, etc?
Sure our state's population is small. Sure we don't produce 100s of Division 1 talent annually ... To me that is a moot point. We aren't going to build a Top 10 team on Iowa recruits. So what's to stop us from bringing in more 4-star recruits from other states? How does Nebraska do it? How does Michigan State, Wisky, Michigan, etc., do it? We compensate our coach with salary that exceeds most of these coaches so why should have the mentality we are just lil 'ol Iowa?
Fan frustration was not built simply on the loss to ISU. Fan frustration has been building after seeing us lose to teams we should not lose to. It's built on watching us get out coached by the likes of Paul Rhoads, Dan McCarney, Interim coaches at Minnesota, first-year coaches at Northern Illinois ... It's losing games we had no right to lose.
We are seeing the direction the program is heading and the first 3 games of this season have made us question the state of the program. With this team, with this schedule ... We should expect 9 or 10 wins ... In reality, we could easily be 1-2 (we should have lost the Ball State game). The product on the field does not match the money and investment spent on the behind-the-scenes production. I would love to see Kirk to turn this thing around. Right now, it looks like we are stopping ourselves.
Kirk has been loyal to Iowa, and in turn, Iowa has been VERY loyal to Kirk in terms of his compensation and contract. I want Kirk to win. We all want Kirk to win. Questioning the state of the program does not mean we are all tossing Kirk under the bus. It means, as in life, if something isn't working then you need to take a long look at what the problem is and how can we fix it.
Three years ago Kirk made staff changes. And right now, it looks like some of those staff changes are not contributing to our program getting back to where it can be and should be. We are a realistic fanbase; we are a patient fanbase; we are a patient university (for the most part). With Iowa's budgets, coaching salaries, facilities, fanbase, and support, this should be a program that regularly wins 8 games a season with a 9 or 10-win season every few years. We aren't Northwestern, Minnesota, Purdue, Indiana, Illinois ... With our investment in salaries and facilities, and a loyal fanbase... expecting at least 8 wins a season is not asking too much (in my opinion).
When you label yourself "lil 'ol Iowa" ... saying we can't get good recruits to come to lil 'ol Iowa, saying we can't compete with the "big boys" ... well you play into that thinking. There is no reason we can't bring in good recruits. Remember Vivian Stringer? She brought in recruits from all over the country and eventually took us to the Final 4. Those same top recruits thought enough of Coach Stringer, Iowa, the university, the facilities ... to call Iowa City home for 4 seasons. Players will go anywhere ... if you have the right coach in place that can convince them to come to Iowa City.
Sure, we aren't go to land 5 stars from the southeast ... But why can't we land more 4 and 5 stars from the Midwest? Is the weather in Iowa City any different than the weather in Lincoln? In South Bend? In Ann Arbor? Are our facilities that much below ND, Michigan, Nebraska, etc?
Sure our state's population is small. Sure we don't produce 100s of Division 1 talent annually ... To me that is a moot point. We aren't going to build a Top 10 team on Iowa recruits. So what's to stop us from bringing in more 4-star recruits from other states? How does Nebraska do it? How does Michigan State, Wisky, Michigan, etc., do it? We compensate our coach with salary that exceeds most of these coaches so why should have the mentality we are just lil 'ol Iowa?
Fan frustration was not built simply on the loss to ISU. Fan frustration has been building after seeing us lose to teams we should not lose to. It's built on watching us get out coached by the likes of Paul Rhoads, Dan McCarney, Interim coaches at Minnesota, first-year coaches at Northern Illinois ... It's losing games we had no right to lose.
We are seeing the direction the program is heading and the first 3 games of this season have made us question the state of the program. With this team, with this schedule ... We should expect 9 or 10 wins ... In reality, we could easily be 1-2 (we should have lost the Ball State game). The product on the field does not match the money and investment spent on the behind-the-scenes production. I would love to see Kirk to turn this thing around. Right now, it looks like we are stopping ourselves.
Last edited: