My issue is that the three more specific reports haven't been made public. Therefore they are toothless and a complete waste of time and money.It’s not as though they didn’t do their jobs, it’s just that it had already became public. If someone comes along and writes a book about WW2 I’m not going to discredit them because there’s nothing in the book I didn’t already consume previously. This is the 3rd party view we haven’t gotten in summation.
Yup which is how it was always going to go. Unless they spoke to new players or got new stories from kids or assistant coaches this was all it was ever going to be.It’s not as though they didn’t do their jobs, it’s just that it had already became public. If someone comes along and writes a book about WW2 I’m not going to discredit them because there’s nothing in the book I didn’t already consume previously. This is the 3rd party view we haven’t gotten in summation.
My issue is that the three more specific reports haven't been made public. Therefore they are toothless and a complete waste of time and money.
The admin at UoI is free to do whatever they want, even if it contradicts the recommendations of those three reports because no one will ever be able to hold their feet to the fire.
Let's play hypotheticals for a minute. Let's say that the investigators found that Brian severely abused his influence, and was found to have been racially biased. I'm not arguing whether he's guilty or not, but for this instance let's assume he was found guilty of that. Let's also say that the investigators recommended removing him from his duties because of it, how on earth does have any effect whatsoever? Unless the rest of the investigation becomes public, how are we to believe that the U is following any of the recommendations other than the generic, "Do a better job" statement?
That's why I'm saying this whole thing was a complete waste of time and money. All they provided the public (this is a public school) is information they already knew. They're just really really expensive news reporters.
They gave the public no specific recommendations, no specific information, and no specific plan.
If the rest of those reports are released (fat chance), then it'd be something valid and useful.
There are actually four. @okeefe4prez quoted it first.I wasn’t aware there were 3 reports. Do you know what they are, and why they wouldn’t be made public? Is it possible the report released today was compilation of the 3 reports?
I wasn’t aware there were 3 reports. Do you know what they are, and why they wouldn’t be made public? Is it possible the report released today was compilation of the 3 reports?
There are actually four. @okeefe4prez quoted it first.
One is the report we just read, and the other three will probably never go beyond the walls of the U.
Yeah that's probably correct. I'm not the sharpest knife in the zip code.I read it as there being 4 separate "personnel reports." So I think the total deliverable here was 5 reports (including the disclosed report).
"Identifiable" has been used as a catchall for decades to shut just about everything down that they (not just Iowa gov't) want shut down. Not only is it a loosely defined term/concept, there's a whole other level of interpretation by the reader as to what information makes someone identifiable.The Iowa Open Records Law contains the following exception to disclosure:
"11. a. Personal information in confidential personnel records of government bodies relating to identified or identifiable individuals who are officials, officers, or employees of the government bodies"
By bifurcating the report, the school gets around its compelled release under the law so that nothing about The Brain will get divulged unless the school decides to divulge it.
https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/code/22.pdf
There is only one question that remains.
Why would Iowa keep Ferentz (both)?
It's time to move on from this tired old school football mentality and bring in some excitement.
I hope Rob FOIA requests the bill. I want to see that shit.
My issue is that the three more specific reports haven't been made public. Therefore they are toothless and a complete waste of time and money.
The admin at UoI is free to do whatever they want, even if it contradicts the recommendations of those three reports because no one will ever be able to hold their feet to the fire.
Let's play hypotheticals for a minute. Let's say that the investigators found that Brian severely abused his influence, and was found to have been racially biased. I'm not arguing whether he's guilty or not, but for this instance let's assume he was found guilty of that. Let's also say that the investigators recommended removing him from his duties because of it, how on earth does have any effect whatsoever? Unless the rest of the investigation becomes public, how are we to believe that the U is following any of the recommendations other than the generic, "Do a better job" statement?
That's why I'm saying this whole thing was a complete waste of time and money. All they provided the public (this is a public school) is information we already knew. They're just really really expensive news reporters.
They gave the public no specific recommendations, no specific information, and no specific plan.
If the rest of those reports are released (fat chance), then it'd be something valid and useful.