lightning1
Well-Known Member
BE isn't going to turn the ball over much. That's for sure. When you constantly pick up your dribble 30' from the goal, "turnovers" isn't going to be your problem.Good lord, we all know Brady isn't a PG. To come on here and rip him for being forced to play out of position is ridiculous. He is what Fran recruited him for, a sharpshooter that plays decent defense, limits his turnovers, and passes well.
Here are some Ellingson stats from last season for you and I'm going with conference only so the numbers are not muddled for games vs sub par teams.
- .523% EFG% - 5th on the team behind 1. Baer, 2. Kriener, 3. Pemsl, & 4. Bohannon. This stat takes into account that 3s are worth more than 2s for a more accurate pure shooter stat. Note that Kriener played half as many minutes as Brady and Pemsl was a force around the rim. This stats shows he was a better pure shooter than Jok and Moss. It should be noted Jok had twice as many minutes and Moss only had 21 more. If you want the more historic stat, Brady shot 45% from 3 during conference play, which led the team outside of Cook's 50% on 1-2 shooting.
- 19.6% AST% - 3rd on the team behind 1. Bohannon and 2. Jok. This stat shows that Brady received an assist on 19.6% of the FGs made while he was on the floor. (I guess the OP was right, Brady has average at best vision (SARCASM))
- 9.2% TOV% - Brady dominated this stat leading the team. This stat shows the number of turnovers he averaged per 100 possessions. (The OP didn't mention turnovers but I did, so figured I'd prove my point. I guess one could infer that his AST% combined with TOV% proves he's more trust worthy of having the ball in his hands than the other backup reserve PG options.) Yes, I realize he isn't the best ball handler, but we are talking backup to the backup for PG and he does not turn the ball over.
- Lastly, just an FYI, Brady had a 4-1 AST to TO ratio last night. Moss was 1-1 and Dailey was 1-3.
If you don't believe me, here are the stats from last season. https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/schools/iowa/2017.html
I'll wait for a response.
The only problem I have with BE is that we have to play a kid with such limited High D-1 ability. And that's not on BE. That's on Fran.
I'd have a problem with Fran if he offered my 17 yr old son and played him in real games. My son is good basketball player but he's not a D-1 basketball player.
And I'd fully expect this and every Iowa message board to openly rip my son's lack of high D-1 ability.