franstheman
Well-Known Member
just seems kinnick has gotten quieter the last few years... idk
Have you been to an audiologist lately?
just seems kinnick has gotten quieter the last few years... idk
Being an old goat, I don't think Kinnick is as rockin' as it was in my day (1983 - 1987 ++), but I chalk that this partially up to nostalgia. And the possibility that "modern" students aren't in to real, live events. Texting and twitting are more fun than a Hawkeye home game, it seems.
Plus, last time I was in Kinnick (Sep 2007 homecoming), I witnessed an ugly, demoralizing, hoosier beat-down of our boys.
Ahh, the jake years....!!
In any generation you are going to have a certain amount of disinterested fans...especially among the students. You will also have a certain amount of fans who bleed black and gold...and a certain amount who are average fans.
The disinterested fans won't cheer much no matter where they are at...the diehards will cheer loudly no matter where they are...the average fan will cheer about as much as the fans around them. Put them in a racous environment and they'll go nuts and vice-versa. In fact...when you put disinterested fans in sections full of people going nuts...you will see an impact on how loud they cheer.
By moving the student section to put more students in the endzone than on the sideline...as opposed to entirely on the sideline...what you are doing is creating an environment where disinterested fans will wait until the last minute to go in and sit in the endzone...guaranteeing that they will not be cheering. Many of the diehards will forego drinking in order to get the best possible seats on the sideline. Which is good and bad...the best fans get the best seats...however...these people would be going nuts no matter where they are...so we're not doing anything to increase the noise level in the stadium.
Then we have the regular fan...they still want to party...and then they start having to much fun and don't want to leave...so they get there right around gametime and end up in the endzone with the disinterested fans and the collective level of enthusiasm in the endzone is severely diminished.
Put all the students on the sideline and you'll increase the noise level in Kinnick immensely.
I think if you just put them in one section, regardless of location, that the noise level would increase. Maryland has it right, they put all of their students at one end of the field.
You still run into the problem of having them disconnected from the action.
Go to CHA sometime and notice the difference between the fans who are on the side of the court and those behind the basket. Even when the team is down and it might not be a very interesting game the fans on the side of the court are making noise and are very much into the action...those behind the basket are just kind of there.
Anything you can do to get the loudest fans closer to the action is a step in the right direction. People have said for years that Carver's biggest problem is that the oldest and least involved fans are the ones closest to the action...and they're exactly right.
Mich 09 was pretty loud too, but the chill in the air may have took something out of the crowd
In any generation you are going to have a certain amount of disinterested fans...especially among the students. You will also have a certain amount of fans who bleed black and gold...and a certain amount who are average fans.
The disinterested fans won't cheer much no matter where they are at...the diehards will cheer loudly no matter where they are...the average fan will cheer about as much as the fans around them. Put them in a racous environment and they'll go nuts and vice-versa. In fact...when you put disinterested fans in sections full of people going nuts...you will see an impact on how loud they cheer.
By moving the student section to put more students in the endzone than on the sideline...as opposed to entirely on the sideline...what you are doing is creating an environment where disinterested fans will wait until the last minute to go in and sit in the endzone...guaranteeing that they will not be cheering. Many of the diehards will forego drinking in order to get the best possible seats on the sideline. Which is good and bad...the best fans get the best seats...however...these people would be going nuts no matter where they are...so we're not doing anything to increase the noise level in the stadium.
Then we have the regular fan...they still want to party...and then they start having to much fun and don't want to leave...so they get there right around gametime and end up in the endzone with the disinterested fans and the collective level of enthusiasm in the endzone is severely diminished.
Put all the students on the sideline and you'll increase the noise level in Kinnick immensely.
Well the renovated south endzone isn't quite as up close and personal as it used to be. It's not as vertical, and more of a gradual incline. That is part of the reason, because less sound gets trapped in (thats why OSU's 100,000 fans seem a lot louder than Michigan's 100,000 fans. It's not that they're actually making more noise, it's just that more of it gets trapped thanks to stadium design).
But the loudest moments in Kinnick that I've experienced: Tyler Sash's INT against PSU (I don't care what anyone says, the place was louder on that play than when Murray made the kick), McNutt's 92-yard TD against Indiana, and Shonn Greene's crazy TD run against Wisconsin.
tm - i agree and have wondered if the south endzone changed the loudness, as i don't think it is as loud as it was before the remodel. not to say it isn't loud, but i think that and the move of the student section has lowered the overall loudness. just what i've thought at some games recently.
loudest, and i mean the loudest i've ever heard it was the 1990 (i think 1990) game v. OSU when they scored with seconds to go to move ahead and eventually win that game. Coincidently, after that TD was the quietest i'd ever heard it..........