Bubble Watch 2013 – The Precarious Resume of Iowa

Typically (but not always) the RPI and Sag/KenPom get pretty close towards the end of the season.
I do not anticipate there being a 55 spot gap at the end of the season. This is why I think Iowa's RPI will jump to the 50s.

i agree with this completely. they tend to converge over the season. its not a direct statistical correlation, but there is correlation present. this is also why our neutral court UNI win will end up helping us (perhaps greatly) by mid-march.
 


i agree with this completely. they tend to converge over the season. its not a direct statistical correlation, but there is correlation present. this is also why our neutral court UNI win will end up helping us (perhaps greatly) by mid-march.

We'll either see the Pomeroy/Sagarin ratings drop or the RPI rise depending on what Iowa (and its opponents do) the rest of the way.
 


I have found it very easy to put the Lickliter years out of my mind. We are playing the pace and style of ball I like to watch. Fran is doing a great job of getting the right pieces...even going back to a guy like Cartwright. Can you imagine what Fran's 1st year would have been like without Cartwright? He wasn't a star but a piece we needed to even step on the floor and make a game of it...and he found in June. I just love where this train is headed...even starting to sense something a little special yet this year.

Iowa will be projected Top 5 in the B1G.
Anything less than 2nd round of the NCAA would probably be a bit disappointing.

Amazing to type that 3 years removed from a 10 win season.
 


I agree and don't anticipate being disappointed!

Side Note: A few days ago I thought we could avoid Michigan with the 6 seed. Today I have no idea which team will be the 3 seed. It might even be Wisconsin which would be the perfect Storm...yeah that pun was just for you. If we can hit that 10-8 and get Wisconsin in the 2nd round. Oh my!

Iowa will be projected Top 5 in the B1G.
Anything less than 2nd round of the NCAA would probably be a bit disappointing.

Amazing to type that 3 years removed from a 10 win season.
 
Last edited:


I see Indy finishing 1st, then MSU, Wisky and UM all tied for 2nd with OSU 5th. MSU plays the other 4 yet in a row. Not taking the time to figure out the tie breaker though. Avoid UM and get 6th would be a good formula.
 


They essentially need to move up 35 spots. Adding 5-6 wins will significantly help. They will need to beat Illinois and Minnesota to get it done.
What game do you think would hurt the least outside of Indiana?
Nebraska (RPI 97 on the Road)
Minnesota (RPI 10 at home)

This is where the RPI gets a little tricky. The Nebby loss would also give you a "bad" loss but i am talking strictly RPI
 


What game do you think would hurt the least outside of Indiana?
Nebraska (RPI 97 on the Road)
Minnesota (RPI 10 at home)

This is where the RPI gets a little tricky. The Nebby loss would also give you a "bad" loss but i am talking strictly RPI

Losing to MN at home would hurt the least, but beating MN at home would help the most, IMO.
That's a phenomenal question posed, by the way.
 




RPI Road Loss factor is 0.5
RPI Home Loss factor is 1.5

Actually, I believe it's .6 for home win and 1.4 for road win. (Correct me if I'm wrong)
But the point remains, losing to Nebraska with a near 100 RPI would hurt more than losing at home to an RPI 10 team, even with the %s.
But I don't think it's black and white.

Beating MN at home even with the .6 would likely be better for Iowa's RPI than beating a 90 RPI team with the 1.4 boost.
 


Actually, I believe it's .6 for home win and 1.4 for road win. (Correct me if I'm wrong)
But the point remains, losing to Nebraska with a near 100 RPI would hurt more than losing at home to an RPI 10 team, even with the %s.
But I don't think it's black and white.

Beating MN at home even with the .6 would likely be better for Iowa's RPI than beating a 90 RPI team with the 1.4 boost.

Yep, 0.6 and 1.4. That probably leans to losing at home to Minnesota.
What about Illinois at home vs. Nebraska on the road?

The point im trying to make is there are 3 Absolute, posititve must win games and those are:
@ PSU
Purdue at Home
Nebraska at Home

Then the best losses are as follows
IU on the road
Minnesota at home
Illinois @ home or Nebby on the road
 


Yep, 0.6 and 1.4. That probably leans to losing at home to Minnesota.
What about Illinois at home vs. Nebraska on the road?

The point im trying to make is there are 3 Absolute, posititve must win games and those are:
@ PSU
Purdue at Home
Nebraska at Home

Then the best losses are as follows
IU on the road
Minnesota at home
Illinois @ home or Nebby on the road

Agree!

Best Losses: Ind on road, MN at home, Ill at home
Worst Losses: PU at home, Neb at home, PSU on road
 


Sorting out the top 4 is getting as difficult (maybe more difficult) as 6th through 8th. I'm going to make an educated guess and it's a total guess on the top 4...would be much easier if I waited until tomorrow to see if Wisconsin can beat Minnesota tonight. If Wisconsin loses tonight I put them alone in 4th with Ohio State 5th.

MSU (15-3) - Only loss is at MI
IN (14-4) - Losses at MSU and at MI
MI (14-4) - Wins out
WI (14-4) - Only loss is at MSU...could lose tonight at MN


I see Indy finishing 1st, then MSU, Wisky and UM all tied for 2nd with OSU 5th. MSU plays the other 4 yet in a row. Not taking the time to figure out the tie breaker though. Avoid UM and get 6th would be a good formula.
 


Assuming Northwestern loses @OSU tonight, will their RPI move up?? Curently they sit at 103, it would be nice to claim 2 more wins over the top 100 RPI.
 


Members of the media are currently in Indianapolis for a mock NCAA tournament selection process. Someone asked Seth Davis whether Iowa is up for consideration, and it doesn't look too good.

Seth Davis ‏@SethDavisHoops
nope. I actually voted for them to be considered but I guess not enough others did RT : Iowa up for consideration?
 
Last edited:




Assuming Northwestern loses @OSU tonight, will their RPI move up?? Curently they sit at 103, it would be nice to claim 2 more wins over the top 100 RPI.

Yes, they will, which shows a flaw in the RPI system. Instead of Iowa playing a pair of the 300+ SOS teams in the early part of the season (which I think was good for the team), if Iowa would played @ Duke and lost by 50, and played @ another top 10 team and lost by 50, they would be 20-25 points higher in the RPI at minimum. Why should they be shown to be a better team when the went to another school and lost ? How can a 50 point loss be better for a team then a 50 point win ? In the RPI it can.

It is a flawed system when SOS is 75% of the calculation.
 


Assuming Northwestern loses @OSU tonight, will their RPI move up?? Curently they sit at 103, it would be nice to claim 2 more wins over the top 100 RPI.

Depends on what everyone else around them does, their score will definitely improve based on the result, but you would have to look at the group of teams ahead and behind of them as well.
 


Yes, they will, which shows a flaw in the RPI system. Instead of Iowa playing a pair of the 300+ SOS teams in the early part of the season (which I think was good for the team), if Iowa would played @ Duke and lost by 50, and played @ another top 10 team and lost by 50, they would be 20-25 points higher in the RPI at minimum. Why should they be shown to be a better team when the went to another school and lost ? How can a 50 point loss be better for a team then a 50 point win ? In the RPI it can.

It is a flawed system when SOS is 75% of the calculation.

That's why instead of playing the South Carolina State's of the world, you play the Stoney Brook's of the world....teams that are usually in the Top 3 of the non-BCS conferences and end up Top 100-Top 150 of the RPI. If I were Iowa, what I would do is try to play as many top 3 non-BCS conference schools at home....teams like Lousiana Tech, New Mexico State, Middle Tenn State, Southern, Western Illinois, Stephen F Austin, Akron, Stony Brook, Mercer, and Montana. If that's the RPI game that needs to be played, then we may as well play it.
 


That's why instead of playing the South Carolina State's of the world, you play the Stoney Brook's of the world....teams that are usually in the Top 3 of the non-BCS conferences and end up Top 100-Top 150 of the RPI. If I were Iowa, what I would do is try to play as many top 3 non-BCS conference schools at home....teams like Lousiana Tech, New Mexico State, Middle Tenn State, Southern, Western Illinois, Stephen F Austin, Akron, Stony Brook, Mercer, and Montana. If that's the RPI game that needs to be played, then we may as well play it.

Up until this year those teams would have beaten Iowa. But going forward that looks like a good strategy.
 


Had Iowa beaten the Spartans when they led by 3 with a a little over a minute left, we would be talking about their seeding possiblities now. :(
 




Latest posts






Top