How may other Big10 teams have you seen with your own eyes? DiNardo has seen them all recently, and he tweeted that the Iowa D-line looked solid.
BTN at Iowa Open Practice
- Thread starter CPHAWK82
- Start date
I think it speaks a lot to Rudock. Wasn't there something about sokol catching him on the depth chart last year?
Casey388
Well-Known Member
That was just hwk23 starting his campaign.
vegashawki
Well-Known Member
Yeah but it was a new offense everyone was learning last year... if we still had KOK almost guarantee Rudock would be the starter. New OC opened the door and made this a 3 horse race, last year I doubt anyone of these options would have been better than JVB just saying.
*ALERT* This is my professional Saturday morning couch QB opinion only, it doesn't not express the opinion of all HN posters.
Last edited:
Hawkfromnorwalk
Well-Known Member
HawkIMalaise
Banned
You are a first class ****** bag. No one said you can't get a few like that, but that is not the foundation for solid and consistent/competitive seasons. How can you argue with Alabama's success not being correlated to their recruiting?
vegashawki
Well-Known Member
Recruiting has NOTHING to do with it, its ALL about coaching. What are all those ******* for before bag? Drain the urine out of your cheerios and go try the meatloaf the has been baking for you all afternoon.
You honestly believe that Alabama and the other SEC teams that are successful and have top 5-10 recruiting anually have nothing to do with their recruiting, it's all coaching? Ok, sure that is one opinion I am guessing more people with disagree with that but it's your opinion.
Golfer
Well-Known Member
Dave Revsine @BTNDaveRevsine
As far as pass rush - said they might mess around some with LB's on the line in passing situations to help provide pressure
As far as pass rush - said they might mess around some with LB's on the line in passing situations to help provide pressure
Don't mind it at all as long as it's in obvious passing situations like 3rd and 8 or longer.
Golfer
Well-Known Member
Changes coverage down field to an extent to man coverage in these situations?
FreedComanche
Banned
I don't get it.
DP5555
Well-Known Member
Dude wasn't even arguing with you and you felt the need to respond like this? I've slipped up and called some people names on here but only after wasting posts upon posts arguing with them. I'm in no way innocent, nor are a lot of us. I'm not claiming that. You, however, seem to have zero humility or class. If this kind of snarky remark is how you'd like to contribute then do us all a favor and hit the road.
Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength.
OUTofTOWNHAWK
Well-Known Member
They must have a lot of trust in the secondary.
Golfer
Well-Known Member
I hope this is it, and I hope it is justified. The alternative as I see it is that the d line needs a ton of work. D line, QB and receivers seems to be the most unanswered questions to me at least. I think the qb situation works itself out. Receiver situation remains to be seen. I'm most worried about d line.
vegashawki
Well-Known Member
I believe it does matter to a certain extent, but I get tired of people not giving these guys a shot even if they were offered a scholarship by the coaches. Coaching is huge and I'm not a KF is god individual but the number of players KF and CO. should be an indication that 2*/3* kids are just as capable of playing at the same lvl. They just might need a yr or two to get the size they need. That is all.
