First, the bad news: once again we hear the "short arms" comment from the draftniks. He measured out at 33 3/8ths and that is considered short by LT standards and I have read where a lot of experts think he could/should be an OG or RT. Possibly all-pro at those positions as good of a run blocker as he is. sounds fine, but OGs and RTs do not get taken in the Top 10 or even Top 15 of the 1st round.
The Good News: He won't go to a crap team like the Raiders if he is chosen in the 2nd half of the first round. May cost him some $$, but ends up on a better team & organization (theoretically).
Bad News - His bench press comes in at .... (wait for it) .... 23. Seriously on the low side compared to his other OL combine attendees. How can such a monster in the weight room only do 23? Now, that is like me criticizing Zach Johnson on the golf course... I couldn't possibly do 23 reps at that weight. Not sure I could do even 1. But, we are not comparing my strength and Brandon's but Brandon's vs other OL candidates.
That is all the news I have so far. I will try to update this when I have a chance.
UPDATE: Brandon ran 5.07 (unofficial) in his 40. that is a win. only 2 guys ran faster, Fisher of Oregon (5.01) and Gibson of VT and they both weigh only 305 or 306 pounds. My commentary here is that unless you run over 5.50 it is very good. Last year someone ran under 5.00 and that grade moves up to "off the charts." Supposedly skyrocketed up the board. If you run worse than 5.50, that is a bad result. His 5.07 is really outstanding. Average for that group looks to be in the 5.25 to 5.30 range. (no statistical analysis, just eyeballing it).
The Good News: He won't go to a crap team like the Raiders if he is chosen in the 2nd half of the first round. May cost him some $$, but ends up on a better team & organization (theoretically).
Bad News - His bench press comes in at .... (wait for it) .... 23. Seriously on the low side compared to his other OL combine attendees. How can such a monster in the weight room only do 23? Now, that is like me criticizing Zach Johnson on the golf course... I couldn't possibly do 23 reps at that weight. Not sure I could do even 1. But, we are not comparing my strength and Brandon's but Brandon's vs other OL candidates.
That is all the news I have so far. I will try to update this when I have a chance.
UPDATE: Brandon ran 5.07 (unofficial) in his 40. that is a win. only 2 guys ran faster, Fisher of Oregon (5.01) and Gibson of VT and they both weigh only 305 or 306 pounds. My commentary here is that unless you run over 5.50 it is very good. Last year someone ran under 5.00 and that grade moves up to "off the charts." Supposedly skyrocketed up the board. If you run worse than 5.50, that is a bad result. His 5.07 is really outstanding. Average for that group looks to be in the 5.25 to 5.30 range. (no statistical analysis, just eyeballing it).
Last edited: