No it doesn't.
Bohannon crow anyone?
- Thread starter DP5555
- Start date
No it doesn't.
You must have misread Dean's post.
His post that included a small portion of the season and includes multiple backup PG's? Yeah even he knows that was a failed attempt
I just assumed since you think Moore is really good and Bohannon is better that we could all agree now how good Jordan is.
Moore is better than Bohannon and has a much higher PER
NikeHawk21
Well-Known Member
Bohannon (13.6 conference PER)
Moore (13.0 conference PER)
So Bohannon is better than Moore in conference?
I don't live in small sample sizes and Bohannon gets the luxury of fake assists. Moore is having a much better season
Adam
Well-Known Member
WTF is a fake assist?
PCHawk says Mike's assists last year and Bohannon's this year are unimpressive and/or fake. They're not making good passes they're just getting them because of the flow of the offense
NikeHawk21
Well-Known Member
At what point will conference play PER be large enough small sample size? Moore has played 8 conference games. Moore has played the conference season alongside two guys projected to be NBA picks. Imagine there are some assists to be had there for a good passer.
deanvogs
Well-Known Member
You live in no sample size at all. You begin ripping on and calling Jordan a failure as he was playing his Sr. year in high school. You constantly say that Jordan is "struggling lately". So you absolutely live in the smallest sample sizes all the time.
Fact is Jordan isn't "struggling lately". Lately (over the last 7 games) Jordan is playing better than half of the 4* PG recruits from '16.
deanvogs
Well-Known Member
Yep, I'd say the majority of the 4* kids have much stronger supporting cast, and their numbers should be much stronger than Jordan's.......but they aren't, especially lately when 56 claims Jordan is struggling.
Jordan has struggled all season long and his numbers reflect it. I honestly thought he'd be a be a better shooter than he has been and that's probably the most disappointing part. I knew his defense would be bad and it's even worse than I expected but I thought he'd be a good shooter
deanvogs
Well-Known Member
You have claimed time and again he is struggling lately since conference play started. Yet that simply isn't true when you look at his stats compared to other 4* PG. Also the PER factors in fake defense, so he is even better than 1/2 of 4* PG with that fake stat factored in. You just claimed it is a good stat, so I'm not sure how you can now argue against it???
I apologize if I said he's struggled in conference play. He's struggled the entire season
deanvogs
Well-Known Member
That isn't what you said/say all the time. On Jan 2nd you admitted that he was playing better, and he was trending up. Then after the Nebraska game all you have talked about is him "struggling lately".
The problem with running trolls is you aren't really sharing your real opinion, so it is hard to remember when you said what. Fact is I am ONLY comparing conference stats BECAUSE OF YOU and your flipping around from saying he was obviously playing better and they way you are constantly trolling that Jordan is "struggling lately".
I look at his entire season and it's been a disappointment. He really needs to stop shooting so much and just focus on his defense. Watching him get blown by over and over by a freshman PG Thursday was probably pretty humbling for some on here
Adam
Well-Known Member
Ludicrous! Getting the ball to a guy coming off of a screen or a pick and roll are the design of a motion offense. The PG is supposed to keep the rhythm by getting the ball out to his teammates at the precise time so they can shoot or drive. Bohannon has a lot of assists because he is good at getting into offensive rhythm. The motion offense is a little too rhythmic at times and can make it harder to change defensively to the rhythm of the opposing offense. That is why you will see our offense scoring and flowing like gang busters just to watch our guys get back on D and let the other team do anything they want.
Whoa don't come at me I'm just repeating what another poster said. He said Mike wasn't a great passer last year so you better attack him
