2-7 vs. the rpi top 50 is better than 1-4 IMO
I was thinking it was record vs top 25 ranking and was focusing on that. You are correct 2-7 is better although still pretty bad lol.
2-7 vs. the rpi top 50 is better than 1-4 IMO
yeah, neither are good
There's a reason teams are in the top 25. They're hard to beat.
Just like there's a reason teams are on the bubble. They're not as good as teams in the top 25.
There are only 37 at large bids. If you can't beat teams in the top 25 or top 50 you should not be in the tournament.
But, you have to take 37 teams and towards the "bottom" they tend to look similar.
Team A
Record: 16-9 (5-5)
RPI: 29
SOS: 13
vs. Top 25: 1-2
vs. 26-50: 0-2
Team B
Record: 18-9 (7-5)
RPI: 59
SOS: 39
vs. Top 25: 0-6
vs. 26-50: 2-1
How does the team who plays 9 top 50 teams (6 against the top 25)have an SOS far below the team who plays 5 against the top 50?
How does the team who plays 9 top 50 teams (6 against the top 25)have an SOS far below the team who plays 5 against the top 50?Team ARecord: 16-9 (5-5)RPI: 29SOS: 13vs. Top 25: 1-2vs. 26-50: 0-2Team BRecord: 18-9 (7-5)RPI: 59SOS: 39vs. Top 25: 0-6vs. 26-50: 2-1
Team A has played 8 teams with an RPI of 150 or below. Team B has played 13 of these teams.How does the team who plays 9 top 50 teams (6 against the top 25)have an SOS far below the team who plays 5 against the top 50?
I still don't see any reason why Colorado state should be in.
Neither do I. They have played a fairly tough schedule (Southern Miss, @ UNI, @ Duke, plus UNLV, San Diego St, and New Mexico), but have just one stand out win against SDSU. Nothing that warrants a bid IMO.
However, the same could be said for NC St. Best wins are Texas and Miami FL.
I still don't see any reason why Colorado state should be in.
Quality vs Quantity?
1 win vs Top 25...could be a top 15 team, maybe even a top 10 or top 5.
Compared to UNI with 3 wins b/w 26-50. Blind, it could be two wins against 45 and a win against 49.
This is what makes blind resumes tough.
You did the math?