B1G Updates COVID-19 Forfeiture Policy

RobHowe

Administrator
ROSEMONT, Ill. – In collaboration and communication with the Big Ten Conference Administrators Council, Chancellors and Presidents, and the Sports Medicine Committee – effective today – the Big Ten Conference has updated its forfeiture policy for remaining 2021-22 conference contests across all sponsored sports.

“The conference office and all 14 Big Ten member institutions have been in continuous contact about developments related to COVID-19,” said Big Ten Conference Commissioner Kevin Warren. “The well-being of our student-athletes and our entire athletic communities is our top priority and we are updating our forfeiture policy to support their health and safety as well as the integrity of conference competition.”

If a team or teams is/are unable to participate in a scheduled Conference competition due to COVID-19, and as a result the competition is unable to occur on the calendar day on which it is scheduled, the competition will not automatically be considered a forfeiture. Upon review and approval by the Conference office, in consultation with the participating institutions and the Big Ten Chief Medical Officer, Dr. James Borchers, the competition may be rescheduled, or declared a no contest or a forfeiture. The Conference office will be responsible for rescheduling any conference competition postponed due to COVID-19.

The number of competitors available – i.e. seven scholarship student-athletes for women’s and men’s basketball – and the availability of at least one countable coach will be factored into the decision-making process. A team that is below the number may still decide to compete if deemed safe by appropriate medical personnel (i.e. the decision to postpone a competition will not be automatic even if a team is below the number).

Conversely, a team that is not below the number of requisite competitors and a coach may still determine that it is unsafe to compete. In such case, forfeiture will not be automatic, but an institution would need to demonstrate to the Conference office, including the Chief Medical Officer, the circumstances that have led to a determination that it would be unsafe to compete. A team that does not compete, and is unable to demonstrate why it is unsafe to compete, will be assessed a forfeiture. Postponed competitions that do not result in forfeiture but are unable to be rescheduled will be declared “no contests.”
 
Looks like they were set in stone on forfeitures but now are muddying the waters with a myriad of possibilities to avoid forfeitures. I guess they were not expecting this problem and now are trying to leave a path so high profile teams can wiggle around it.
 
Let's see: instead of a clear-cut policy of 'forfeits', games may now be a forfeit, no contest, or rescheduled -- depending on what the "Conference office" decides. And who, pray tell, at the "Conference office" makes those final decisions? Good follow-up question for Iowa media members. Also, a team with less than 7 scholarship players could still play a game if approved by undefined "medical personnel", but a team with 10 players on scholarship could petition to not play a game if they can convince the "Conference office" it would be unsafe for them to compete. Right. How many teams do you think will petition the "Conference office" that it would be "unsafe" for them to play Purdue and Illinois?
 

Latest posts

Top