HAWKEY3
Well-Known Member
OK, possible misread on my part.
Are we the third best team in Iowa?
- Thread starter longtimer
- Start date
InGoodCo
Well-Known Member
He's currently 5th in the B1G in assists and like 8th best in 3 pt fg's made - 13 games into his career - F'ing stud.
HAWKEY3
Well-Known Member
Are you still here, Beavis? Touch of Mink demands punctuality from its sanitation staff. You don't want another write up.
deanvogs
Well-Known Member
Don't confuse my trolling on Cyclonefanatic with "what I believe". I used to troll the hell out of Cyclonefanatic with advanced metrics. This is how I know this is your troll, you are just copying me. Heck I was saying Gesell >>> Monte and Clemmons >> Thomas, it would drive Clown fans nuts. I'd use the PER and advance metrics to make my case.
It is basically everything you are doing. I have run this very troll years ago. I just did it as a Hawk fan on a Clown sit, I didn't hide who/what I was. You are doing it pretending to be a Hawk fan on a Hawk site.
You said Gesell was better than Monte? There isn't an advanced statistic in the world that could back that up haha
NikeHawk21
Well-Known Member
Cook has only played in 6 games so I honestly wouldn't include him in the list right now. He will be our second best player when he returns.
1. Jok
2. Baer
3. Pemsl
4. Moss
5. Wagner
6. Bohannon
7. Ellingson
8. Uhl
9. Williams
My judgements are a little less on stats and more about what have you done for me in the big games/ big wins. That's why I have Baer in front of Pemsl. Ellingson has played well but his role is limited.
Why does it matter where Bohannon ranks though? Similar to what PC said I wish Bohannon was our worst scholarship player because that would mean we had plenty of guys better than him.
1. Jok
2. Baer
3. Pemsl
4. Moss
5. Wagner
6. Bohannon
7. Ellingson
8. Uhl
9. Williams
My judgements are a little less on stats and more about what have you done for me in the big games/ big wins. That's why I have Baer in front of Pemsl. Ellingson has played well but his role is limited.
Why does it matter where Bohannon ranks though? Similar to what PC said I wish Bohannon was our worst scholarship player because that would mean we had plenty of guys better than him.
You can't call Jones a hit or miss. The discussion is about whether or not Fran made a mistake recruiting him. A hindsight injury doesn't answer that question.
When you recruit 5 people in the same class, at least one or two will leave almost every time unless you have the fab 5. So the fact that 2 left is neither good or bad. It's standard.
What we ended up with is one player that looks like he will be a good starter, one that looks like he will be a good 6th man, and one player who might very well get recruited over. I think the class was right in between good and bad. But they are less than 2 years in so it could go further either way.
When you recruit 5 people in the same class, at least one or two will leave almost every time unless you have the fab 5. So the fact that 2 left is neither good or bad. It's standard.
What we ended up with is one player that looks like he will be a good starter, one that looks like he will be a good 6th man, and one player who might very well get recruited over. I think the class was right in between good and bad. But they are less than 2 years in so it could go further either way.
You think Bohannon was played better than Ellingson this year? Haha
deanvogs
Well-Known Member
When Monte struggled early, before he righted the ship......sound familiar?
That's weird. I'd love to see you rank our players 1-10
deanvogs
Well-Known Member
Isn't Ellingson the kid you said was a total miss, and sucked balls? You viewed Moss as garage and a total miss because he couldn't beat out Ellingson.
Now you are gonna sing Ellingsons praises? LOL man, TROLOLOLOLOL away.....
deanvogs
Well-Known Member
Why are running my troll on HN, get some new material. You are saying Mike >>>> than player X 10 games into their career.
You also think I like advanced stats because I ran a troll with them back in the day??? LOL, and Ellingson is now good??? You ran smack on how bad he was last year and beginning of this year. HAHAHAHA
I've never thought Ellingson was good because he hasn't been but he's playing really well this year.
deanvogs
Well-Known Member
Hold on, you are going to parse this and say he isn't good, but he is player really well this year?
HAHAHA, your troll has failed a long time ago. We just like mocking you really, please, please keep showing us how stupid Clown fans are.
Remember how big of per minute stats you were when referencing Williams. Can you believe Ellingson is averaging 15.4 ppg per 40 minutes while shooting 59% from 3
I didn't think Ellingson was good going into this season but you can't deny the production he is putting up right now. He's been really solid this year. I do think he'll regress some. He's not going to shoot over 50% from 3 this season
Nope
