HawkeyeWalker
Well-Known Member
I expected it to be bad but not this bad
Your trolling?....I agree.
I liked Mike G, I like JBo's potential.
What's your point again? Nevermind, I don't care. Carry on...and on...repeat...repeat.
I expected it to be bad but not this bad
Your trolling?....I agree.
I liked Mike G, I like JBo's potential.
What's your point again? Nevermind, I don't care. Carry on...and on...repeat...repeat.
What I said was not trolling
Maybe not 1 post. But when you post 500+ times trying to prove or proclaim that Jordan sucks, that becomes a troll.
Saying he's worse than Mike is not trolling but anything said that doesn't fit your narrative is trolling in mind
You can say it as much as you want, everyone knows you are a Troll. Like I just said, now posting for the 501 time is what makes you a troll.
Responding to nonsense is not trolling
So you are the self proclaim Jordan Bohannon sucks and I'm gonna make sure to make sure every last person on this board agrees with me Police? If so, that's cool. I mean I am an admitted troller of trolls. If this is your gig, and your calling, just let us all know. I mean you are doing God's work for sure.
If people are going to say he's better than Mike I will respond. I said he was going to be below average and PG would be a weakness this year and so far I've been right, when people call me out like I was wrong on him I will respond.
So Mike was a below average PG as a Fr.? I totally disagree with that. I think Mike had a pretty good Fr. year.
If people are going to say he's better than Mike I will respond
Mike was not below average as a freshman. Jordan has been
If people are going to say he's better than Mike I will respond. I said he was going to be below average and PG would be a weakness this year and so far I've been right, when people call me out like I was wrong on him I will respond.
So now all you said was he will be below average?
On a scale of 1 to 100 Mike was a 60 his Fr. year. I think Jordan is a 59.99. I am not saying Jordan is better, so you can't respond to this.
I don't remember what I said. I said we would be in trouble this year with him and CW and we haven't been good. I might have said I don't think he'll be good and he hasn't been good
How good can I call Moss, before you will rip on him? Just curious, you said he was gonna suck and debated that until your position was clearly untenable. Then you change it to "well Moss won't ever be All Conference" so that you could keep on bagging on him. What is now acceptable for us to say about Moss before you come bashing on that or Moss?
I don't remember what I said. I said we would be in trouble this year with him and CW and we haven't been good. I might have said I don't think he'll be good and he hasn't been good
How good can I call Moss, before you will rip on him? Just curious, you said he was gonna suck and debated that until your position was clearly untenable. Then you change it to "well Moss won't ever be All Conference" so that you could keep on bagging on him. What is now acceptable for us to say about Moss before you come bashing on that or Moss?
Oh great, here come another 100 posts saying you're an idiot for thinking he's a 59.99 because he's clearly only a 59.98.
But now we are looking pretty good and he is a big reason for it.