HomerChampless
Well-Known Member
Should Chigozie Ejiasi, the Director of Player Development at Iowa, be held accountable for these athletic problems? Should Iowa hire a 2nd, 3rd, or 4th Director of Player Development?
Last edited:
I wouldn't give a rats *** if KF left or was fired at this point.
In fact, I think its for the better if he did leave.
NeilDiamond, you are a fool. Done with KF? No even close. Has it ever occurred to you that the unfortunately common issues Iowa experiences with their football program is magnified because you are a "fan" and pay attention to them a little more closely? Or how about that KF may not look the other way when their are issues like an SEC coach?
Again, Neil, you are a fool and Sweet Caroline is an overrated piece of sh$& song.
Question to the blind followers: At what point, if ever, would you favor a change at head coach?
Should we wait until 3-9 seasons are the norm, should we wait until more players are arrested for felonies, should we wait until fan apathy has set in? What is the point that the many many many issues should be addressed? I'm trying to understand how continuing as is will some how miraculously change results on & off the field. Please explain.
I'm down on KF because we pay him $4 million a year (which is top 10 money) for a mediocre product. Be the same as you paying a car dealer for a brand new caddy and they deliver a used chevy.
Now many of you would just say "we're Iowa, we only deserve a used chevy even though we paid for a new caddy."
I'm not that concerned about the suspensions or drop out rate. I just get tired of the bonehead coaching decisions, the stubbornness, the predictablity in play calling, and the staff making the same mistakes (e.g. - clock management) year after year after year.
Question to the blind followers: At what point, if ever, would you favor a change at head coach?
Should we wait until 3-9 seasons are the norm, should we wait until more players are arrested for felonies, should we wait until fan apathy has set in? What is the point that the many many many issues should be addressed? I'm trying to understand how continuing as is will some how miraculously change results on & off the field. Please explain.
Perhaps teh OP would want GarBar to hire Tressel.
You have raised some interesting questions here Trey. I am not a blind supporter, but I am also not a pitchfork hater. I'm just upset by where the program is and seems to be headed. Does that mean a change at the top is needed? I don't know, I could probably be swayed either way on that.
However your point is a good one. When and what justifies a change? I really don't know and would be interested to see the answers of some of the staunch KF supporters.
The whole Coker/McCall thing is kind of the cherry on the cake for me. The underachieving despite making top 10 money is one thing. However, the inability to keep players on the field and in the program has simply gotten out of hand. One time can be seen as an accident, more a trend. At this point, we are look at it being more of a rule that a healthy percentage of the RBs we bring in (that actually can play B10 FB) will do something to defame the University. Then you have the increadible attrition at other positions. I think I saw a stat that the 2 deeps had 10 walk-on players this year. What the hell is going on over there?