1977Hawkeye
Well-Known Member
The scoreboard speaks for itself.
That's all that matters, my friend. While everyone else is all hung up on Michigan and Notre Dame, we'll be playing in the BCS... or at least at least a January Bowl game.
The scoreboard speaks for itself.
Palmer is definately a tool, but I did not think the game announcers did too bad.
The one guy kept saying we when talking about Mich. I wonder who he was a fan of. Plus he kept messing up Iowa's players names.
Palmer is the worst analyst on the air. Smug and arrogant Canadian db. At least Holtz and Corso have winning experience.
Huh? No matter what the announcers said they had the score on the screen..how could he have not known if we lost??
Did anyone else notice that for about a minute after Iowas scored the field goal in the 4th quarter that the score on the screen read 35-31? ......when it should've read 38-28.
Honestly that's the first time I've ever seen that happen in college or pro football game. My wife noticed it first and brought it to my attention.
His little derisive snort of "Iowa!"? I actually caught that, too. Palmer's a DB.
The list goes like this:
Michigan made a valiant effort....
What Michigan didn't seem to be able to do...
Too many mistakes for Michigan...
Not ONE bit of credit given to Iowa for winning. Unreal.
That's the way it's been and will always be. The scoreboard speaks for itself.
Palmer is definately a tool, but I did not think the game announcers did too bad.
Isn't Jessie Palmer the guy who went on a TV show to supposedly select his wife from a group of women he had never met before? How shallow and dense do you have to be to do that? The guy has little credibility. I wouldn't worry about his opinions. I don't think the audience takes him very seriously.