Search results

LOL I'm still listening to this. Deace talking about buying out Fran.

Jon good stuff. However I'm not sure you know truly what the issue is with Iowa. First you talk about the problem being not having a dynamic back (which is what I agree with) then you evolve your argument to make it scheme based.

The scoring was even after the technical foul FT's were shot, were they not? I was just as p----d as everyone else after the game but the team battled. Could have just as easily caved and lost by 15.

I didn't say that. I was 8 at the time so I barely remember it. Lute obviously was the better coach. I was 8 so I wasn't sad.

NBA? While I appreciate the enthusisam he's got a LONG way to go before that is even a possibility. I mean...a LONG way.

There have been two coaches I was sad to see leave: George Raveling and Steve Alford.

Offensively I can think of a few, namely ball handling and footwork.

You leave Basabe in the starting lineup because he doesnt seem like the kind of guy that would do well coming off the bench. In my opinion. Plus, and take this FWIW, Fran says he's getting it done in practice and thats why he continues to start. Still, Fran's comments after the game the other...

May has many shortcomings. But there is no way that Josh is a better defender than May. No chance. So then what? Are we going to ask Josh to outscore his guy? Have you seen the number of shots he passes up because he's scared to take them? And that's him coming off the bench. You don't think the...

Marble won't be PG next year because Fran recruited two in next year's class. He's going to play on the wing.

lol..

I'm not one of those guys that believes that all the best looks were in the past. I like a lot of the new uniforms, especially the Oregon stuff. But these are awful.

The 2/3 are pretty much the same position in offense so calling Marble a 2 or May a 3 is really the same thing.

May is starting at one of the wing positions next year. Ingram or Clemmons will be coming off the bench. In my opinion the only question mark is who starts at the 4? Gesell/Clemmons at PG May at 2 Marble at 3 White/Basabe/McCabe/Meyer at 4 Woodbury at 5

I'm telling you guys, Marble playing the wing is best for the team even if on Day 1 of next year he's the "best" of the 3 PG's. It'll be that way because of his experience but wont stay that way for long. I'd rather throw one of the freshmen to the fire and let them take their lumps against...

Barnstormers must have made a few phone calls. :)

*holds breath*

Uhhhhhhh................what?

Here's my question for you though. Why not start Gesell or Clemmons right away and move Marble to the wing right away? Couldn't they be gaining valuable experience against supposed "cream puffs" and work through any growing pains? I would say yes. I just dont see any upside to starting Marble at...

One thing to remember is that our wings dont shoot nearly as well as they could because of the lack of an inside/out approach to getting open looks. We get almost all of our looks from 3 on down screens and stagger screens. The easiest look at three is if you can spot up and have the post kick...