Search results

No more than iowa turns it up against ISU. The last couple years the ISU game has been one of Iowa's best performances, and one of ISU's worse. If anything the last couple years it was Iowa's superbowl and the exact opposite for ISU. And this year? ISU did damn near everything it could to lose...

Something hawks and clones can come together and agree on.

ISU\Iowa have a bit of leverage in this situation. Its not like theyre forced to play drake, and both schools should think of themselves as on a level above Drake. If ISU\Iowa said 'this is how its going to be'... thats likely how it would be. And why would ISU 'not give drake the whole...

ISU\Iowa should get their games with drake scheduled so that alternate years theyre at CHA\Hilton, and the other year at WF. Either game will draw more than enough people to justify putting it in WF.

The whole 'ADs need to be self sufficient' thing only became an issue once Iowa did it. Its a made up controversy. Every dollar that either university contributes to its athletics, it more than gets back in marketing benefits. Enrollment, alumni retention, statewide goodwill, donor development...

If true, how does it not effect ISU? ISU at best would be left out on an island from the big 12. At worst its seeking a new conference that would likely be a downgrade.