Search results

fans have the right to disagree with former players, right? how was that an "attack" on MJ? i didn't see any of the tweets, so can you tell me if any of the tweets contained threats against MJ?

you really think gundy could waltz right into the football facility wearing an OAN shirt and not feel like he could get fired now? sorry, rob, that ain't the real world and you should know that...

because if anyone else wanted to wear an "OAN" t-shirt, they'd be mobbed. "OAN" has become restricted speech, rob. do you really not see that?

CAN YOU ANSWER A QUESTION WITH AN ACTUAL ANSWER? you're dancing around it, rob. your written words have said it's okay for some to be able have all the rights available under the 1st amendment, but not everyone can have the exact same full rights available to them. do you believe that to be...

"OAN" is now restricted speech because of this. that is suppression of the first amendment. you're confusing yourself by not following simple logic and linear thought. this entire engagement at OSU has notified everyone that "OAN" is not allowed.

more questions and no direct answer.

straw man, rob. i'm asking you. you're the one who wrote that (paraphrase) it's about time people listen to someone else's story. well, that works both ways, rob. you can't answer my question with a question and some sort of vague mumbling. you've made a professional career based on the 1st...

kneeling for the national anthem is either a direct message that you do not care what the anthem represents, or, not having an understanding of it. America is an imperfect place. the world is an imperfect place. but America is the nation that has done, is doing, will do more than any other...

rob, those who are against kneeling view exactly how the person viewed coach gundy's OAN t-shirt, but you're all for that to play out with gundy having to apologize. why can't the kneelers be made to apologize?

wow...you got it. it's as simple as having manners.

you did try really hard ree4. look at my response to fryowa. you're just being naive.

are you that naive to think gundy wasn't thinking about his contract and his security. gundy has millions of reasons to just apologize and move on. yes, in my opinion he lost his spine. drew brees did the same thing. apologize for self preservation. you can't really be that naive, friend...

thank you ok4p for putting that moniker on it. you're right, the heckler's veto. but utilizing a heckler's veto doesn't make the heckler right or the subject of the heckle wrong. when people forget to have a spine and stand up for what is right, in the case, free speech on both sides and no...

trj, see my post. i didn't see yours until after i posted. i agree with you, but it does happen. radio show host leo terrell, who is a civil liberties lawyer and a black man, has stated he's been called that type of name because he is against defund the police and against blm because blm does...

i don't know how generally that it happens, but it does happen. let's be realistic, it is difficult for anyone to have a true change of mind or change of heart. that is just difficult for humans to do. getting angry over someone else's opinion or point of view and demanding that contrary...

I would like to thank your family for their service and sacrifice. Your brother and father-in-law both fought to preserve our rights to responsibly and peacefully disagree with each other. They fought to preserve the only country known in the universe that allows this to the degree that...

so explain it ree4. you're the funny guy with the meme's. go ahead and explain the 1st amendment instead of simply trying to be funny and sounding like you know stuff.

fry, you are just not right. of course the person also has a right to speak his dislike of any statement, written or spoken. But to demand an apology from someone who (apparently) has an opinion that is different from yours is NOT free speech or protesting, it is suppression of speech.

lol...yeah, it's been so boring. point taken. and the "we're all f*cked" part only happens if we allow it to happen. i am waiting for rob's dm, though and response to my question.

you missed the point, kicker, but highlighted mine. with his written words rob is showing that he agrees that first amendment rights should be suppressed. anyone that believes that is an idiot. my point was that i could find things that were offensive to me and tell him not to write them...