Search results

And many more to go

I certainly accept criticism. That said, a sports message board is designed for sharing opinions (good and bad) regarding the topic, in this case Iowa football. Besides, it would be boring if we all thought the same.

Apologist: a person who makes a defense in speech or writing of a belief, idea, etc. Fool: a silly or stupid person; a person who lacks judgment or sense. Clueless: slang helpless; stupid Annoying: causing annoyance; irritatingly bothersome: annoying delays. You're right...

I'm not really bothered by it and you're taking me out of context. I'm just referring to the constant slams and minimizing of differing opinions. We all have different opinions and that's understandable. My opinion is that the overly sensitive people are those who go on the attack everytime...

"However the fools that attack and call for resignations, firings, and say things like the NFL will not want Ferentz now are really clueless and annoying." But you see Lifehawk, that's exactly what I'm talking about. If someone disagrees with you they are labeled fools and are both clueless...

I keep my criticism within Hawk circles. This message board is one of my outlets. When I am around Clown fans who criticize the Hawks I act more like the apologists I'm referring to and get very defensive.

Good points

I don't see the sense of entitlement you speak of. Secondly, the term hostility only represents a fraction of the posts. I believe the others regard sarcasm and attempts to minimize differing opinions.

I'm certainly at fault too. I make some mean spirited posts from time to time, some even geared towards other posters. It's just been a pet peeve of mine that I get made to be a hawk hater of troll just because I get frustrated on gamedays.

They call that KF koolaid? And here all this time I thought I've been drinking Miller Light.

Are they hostile towards the coaching (tone of the post) or towards other posters? There is a difference.

Reading through the posts that criticize KF's coaching decisions, you immediately find several posts with sarcastic and spiteful replies such as: "did not read" "another one off the bandwagon" "I wish you two were coaching the games." "I guess I am an expert on girl's field hockey. I...

By the way, you contradicted yourself in your post. How do "conservative schemes" differ from my point on the offense. I'll play your game. Maybe you meant the type of offense ran such as pro-style, spread ect... If so, you've already taken me completely out of context. I was referring to...

Excuse me, but my post reflects the intent of the article in question. So much so that it was paraphrased from the orginal source. "So how did Ferentz spice up his possessions against a Husker defense that at home has allowed single-game point totals of 29, 38, 27 and 28 this season...

I don't question the will , but you're drinking koolaid if you aren't questioning the way.

Price is right? At least there's an effort on there.

You're asking too much. You're just going to get Ferentz in your stocking.

Apparently you can never change coaches because Alford is lurking in the shadows ready to take the job and ruin your program. Makes sense.

What more facts does wa1974 want? I think the facts laid out in the article stating that the Huskers have given up 29 to Fresno St, 38 to Washington, 27 to Ohio St and 25 to Northwestern at home are plenty. The only team Nebraska's D shut down all year at home was Michigan State which...

Just to humor you: twinhawkfans - "We'll see how good their secondary is at tackling when Coker is running through holes that you could drive a bus through. this may be KF's best Oline ever. Good Luck. UI 31 ISU 13" ICAlumni - "You lose Arnaud, Robinson, Franklin, Lamaak, Sims, etc...