Recent content by rdawsoniii

NIT is probably the most realistic at this point. Too many likely losses the rest of the way. I suppose the Hawks could make a BTT run, but considering Fran has NEVER won more than one game in the BTT, that seems highly unlikely.

I don’t disagree with him on this. Really bad optics to publicly interview for an NFL job on signing day.

With the latest bit of bad news, we can probably chalk today up as a loss.

The fans in Kinnick will riot if Petras trots out to start the game.

I see the usual litany of excuses and rationalizations are on full display. Personally, I don’t expect any national championships for Iowa. But I would like to see at least an average offense on the field, and a Big 10 West title more than once a decade. That’s not too much to ask nor expect...

Why on earth would anybody watch a basketball game on a phone in the first place?

Always defer when winning the toss. Always. I just don’t understand why Kirk continues to put our crap offense out there to start the game.

I guess they have to try something. Plumb isn’t really an upgrade.

It’s simple….Hawks win, they are still in the running for the West. Hawks lose….for all intents and purposes it’s over.

Wisconsin 20 Iowa 3

Those who think this is the game where Kirk will open up the offense……well, we’ve been waiting several years now. Don’t think it’s gonna happen. There may be a few wrinkles but I suspect it will be mostly the same. Iowa should win, but I have a feeling our offensive ineptness will ge our...

Which is why I included the 2002 offensive line.

Of course I don’t believe it and nowhere did I say I did. I posted that as an example of what a delusional fool cytwins is. If you ever want a good laugh, you should visit cyclone fanatic some time and read the drivel he posts.

Cytwins is saying Pollard wanted to drop the series a few years ago but Barta wouldn’t let him.

Not with our current offensive line. CJ with the 2002 offensive line….definitely.