One would think so. But look at MSU. Look at segments of our government and our intelligence community. Look at Hollywood. Look at industry, where Apple, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, et. al., are complicit in the invasion of privacy, yet face little to no consequences.
What ties that stuff together? Scapegoats. Nassar (MSU), Manafort, et. al. (government), Weinstein & Cosby (Hollywood), Cambridge Analytics (industry) get presented on the proverbial silver platter, thus allowing the real players to keep the money a-churnin'.
PSU, for all its faults (both sides, really), was pretty decisive when it got to "trustee/regent" levels. I would think that would happen at O$U, but it hasn't happened at MSU, what with Nassar being fitted for a gargantuan-sized sword to go with his orange jumpsuit. Does O$U have regents/trustees that will stand up? OTOH, unless/until we "know" how complicit Meyer was, this still could turn into a "nothing-to-see-here" item on page four.
The other question becomes, "Will this affect recruiting?" Looking at PSU and MSU, and even places like Baylor, it seems to be a resounding, "No!" But maybe this becomes the "push" needed to get recruits thinking beyond bling, jerseys and "developing a great relationship". Could you, as a recruit's parent, ever look a PSU or MSU coahc in the eye and say, "What's past is past" and tell your son/daughter to overlook that past? Too many "parents' can answer that in the affirmative. But the second it affects recruiting is the second before Meyer is shown the door.