In my mind, as I was watching that shit show unfold Saturday, I thought to myself, "Well, other than Jonathan Taylor, most of those guys should be gone after this year, so that should bode well for us." Based on the way they were playing, I assumed most of those guys were seniors.
Then I go and look at their two deep and find out they are just as young as we are!
For example, our OL goes Freshman, Junior, Junior, Senior, Freshman. Theirs goes Sophomore, Junior, Freshman, Junior, Sophomore. And their center, who was kicking our ass up and down the field all day on those pulls he did around the tackle....yep, he's a freshman. So how is it that their freshman OL kicks our ass, but ours are "young"?
Next year, on defense, they return their NT (most important position in a 3-4), 3 of their 4 LBs (plus Cichy, who's currently injured), and their leading tackler at S (Dixon). Not to mention, their entire OL and Taylor at RB.
So then my question is.....if us and Wisky essentially get the same level of recruits, at least according the the rating services, and if our starters are roughly equal in age, at least as far as position groups go, then why are we so far behind, developmentally, than they are? I understand the "haters" answer will be "Well, because Ferments (or some other lame ass nickname) is our coach!"....but seriously....what is it that they are doing day in and day out, week in and week out, over the summer, in the spring, etc that makes them so much more prepared and polished on a consistent basis than we are?