ClintonIAfan
Well-Known Member
Iowa has one 3 of the last 4 in Madison. Going up there is not a problem for this team.
Ok I'm a little behind the times so what's with calling them Connies. Go Hawks
Stats like that would matter if any current players had anything to do with those wins... I take those trends with a grain of salt. If Iowa wins it'll be because we are better team not just because of a trend that don't matter. That's like saying KF is 10-2 during games where it's cloudy outside and he called heads to win the coin toss... It's an interesting yet irrelevant trend. BTW I made that 10-2 up you get my point.Iowa has one 3 of the last 4 in Madison. Going up there is not a problem for this team.
Their scout board. It's pretty funny...lots of rationalization. The best comment was "CJB couldn't even beat out Rudock. Therefore, Rudock is the better QB, and Rudock couldn't beat us last year."
Stats like that would matter if any current players had anything to do with those wins... I take those trends with a grain of salt. If Iowa wins it'll be because we are better team not just because of a trend that don't matter. That's like saying KF is 10-2 during games where it's cloudy outside and he called heads to win the coin toss... It's an interesting yet irrelevant trend. BTW I made that 10-2 up you get my point.
Exactly. The stats that include what a coaches record is when they are up after halftime or 3rd quarter or what it is when they win the turnover margin. Stats that are game related for sure I'm down with too. But your exactly right those trends earlier referenced are for sports jeopardy that's all they are good for.Couldn't agree more. Most of these "trends" are not even really trends so much as interesting trivia. Give me a meaningful trend backed by a sound theory as to why it accounts for wins/losses and then I'll be interested.
I know there is a thread about them looking past us but from what I have seen they think it will be a blowout. They also act like this game has never been close?