I didn't see the Wisconsin game, but I guess I would have to see how long they left the starters in the game. Again, it's a product of the BCS and making an impression. How many times last year did we hear, "Iowa only beat such and such by 3 points", etc. That kept up all season long. It was like the "pollsters" seemed to gloss over the fact that Iowa won @Penn St., Mich. St. and Wisconsin.
This is what I was curious about. I can kind of understand if the 3rd stringers were in a large portion of the second half. I've always thought that Iowa should run up the score a little more - say in the 40's. However 70 is just stupid.