Defer or take the ball? Ferentz likes to take the ball although he has deferred a few times
If we win the toss play defense
Unless there is inclement weather, with a senior or very experienced QB always take the ball for a few reasons.
1) You assure yourself one extra offensive possession.
2) Great if you have an experienced QB who doesn't turn the ball over which plays into point #3.
3) You get first chance to control Field Position and the line of scrimmage. Especially with having a good punter to flip the field. Have trust in your team to move the chains.
4) You get first chance to get a chance to control the Time of Possession. TOP and line of scrimmage are huge for a team like Iowa.
There are certain situations where you would want to defer. Inclement weather as noted above, a young QB or a QB who may be turnover prone. If you thought your D really matched up well to stop an opposing O and pin them back right away, etc.. But, I think typically a team has a better shot taking the ball first if they are a solid team. Look at the NFL. In the NFL teams usually take if first. I presume they know what they are doing.
Interestingly enough, early on in Kirk's tenure at Iowa including his first great teams 2002 - 2005, he always took the ball first. I think there was even a record of how many times Iowa got the fall first in a row starting games. I think Patty F. at NW strategically ended it by taking the ball after winning the coin flip once.
There is a point #5 I need to add.
5) In college many teams defer first. If a team takes the ball after winning the coin toss, that team will always start with the ball if the other team defers if they would win the toss. This consistency with starting with the ball every game could really be beneficial for a team as they are used to it. This was kind of the case with the great 2002 Brad Banks team. They got the ball to start every game. I think they scored on the first drive almost every game.
Those are my thoughts.
Brian Ferentz, if you need any help, look me up!