Why is IOWA always over-achieving?

DeanMarshall

Well-Known Member
Actually, I already know the answer, but take a look at the past two seasons.

In fall of 2008, no one predicted Iowa would be in the Top 20, except Iowa fans, like me.

In fall 2009, alot of Pre-season rankings did have us in Top 20, but not TOP 10! (Did I mention that the Fishwrap at SI didn't have IOWA in their preseason 20 at all? That rag knows ZERO about College Football today)

GO HAWKEYES! :)
 
Once again, I genuinely hope for your sake that you're just a troll.

Sadly, he takes himself completely seriously. He thinks strident, self-aggrandizing gibberish makes for a good, constructive post.
:mad:
 
Ever is being sarcastic with the title of this thread. If you aren't familiar with his style of posting, get used to it.
 
At what point is it no longer overachieving?? I mean maybe the national pundits dont know what they are talking about??
I wouldnt call Iowa's success overachieving at all.......
 
At what point is it no longer overachieving?? I mean maybe the national pundits dont know what they are talking about??
I wouldnt call Iowa's success overachieving at all.......

Well, that is sort of my point, brewhawk..........And thanks to sdbolt, a poster on TOS.........Here is more ammo----

Longest Active Streaks Holding Opponents to 30 Points or Less:

1. 30 games - Iowa :)

2. 23 games - Ohio St
3. 21 games - TCU
4. 14 games - Alabama
5. 13 games - Penn St
6. 12 games - Virginia Tech
7. 8 games - Nebraska
8. 7 games - UCLA
8. 7 games - Navy
10. 6 games - North Carolina

Longest Active Streaks Without Losing by more than 7 Points:

1. 28 games - Boise St
2. 26 games - Iowa
3. 21 games - TCU
4. 19 games - Pittsburgh
5. 14 games - Alabama
5. 14 games - UConn
7. 13 games - Notre Dame
8. 12 games - Virginia Tech
9. 11 games - Navy
10. 8 games - North Carolina
10. 8 games - Nebraska
10. 8 games - Buffalo
 

Latest posts

Top