tubahawk
Well-Known Member
I was kicking around if I should do this as a blog as opposed to a post, but I'd like to hear folks opinions on this.
I am looking at the current status of the Iowa basketball program and began thinking back about Alford and trying to piece together some "accountability" for the current situation.
One thing that seems to be a given now that wasn't 4 years ago is that Alford wasn't the right person. I find this interesting.
Without getting into the name calling (apologist/haters/etc...) I'm looking at Lickliter and seeing many of the same conversations that happened with Alford starting to happen about Lickliter (as far as should he still be the coach). I am not calling for anyone to be fired, I'm simply pointing out what I see as a historical perspective.
I don't think I ever heard Jon or Spank say "Alford needs to go" during his final years at Iowa. I do recall hearing about how this team is a player or two away from "turning the corner". Yet now they look back and comment how Alford left Iowa in a world of hurt. I'm not saying they thought Alford was doing great, but I don't recall either one being critical of contract the extensions either.
Now I look at Lickliter. Is history repeating itself? At what point (if ever) would it be conceded that Lickliter isn't the right guy?
Respectfully, if Jon and/or Spank didn’t acknowledge Alford was a bust until after he left I'm not sure they could ever bring themselves to acknowledge Lickliter (who is much more likable than Alford) isn't the answer for Iowa.
I still value and respect both Jon's and Spank's opinion. But looking at it from a historical context I'm just not sure they are the most "progressive" (for lack of a better word) when it comes to admitting it's time to cut the coaching strings. I'm hearing a lot of the same platitudes that I heard when Alford was around.
So if history is any indication of future behavior, if you’re looking for Jon or Spank to say "It's time for Lickliter to go", in my opinion you won't hear it.... until after Lickliter leaves Iowa.
I am looking at the current status of the Iowa basketball program and began thinking back about Alford and trying to piece together some "accountability" for the current situation.
One thing that seems to be a given now that wasn't 4 years ago is that Alford wasn't the right person. I find this interesting.
Without getting into the name calling (apologist/haters/etc...) I'm looking at Lickliter and seeing many of the same conversations that happened with Alford starting to happen about Lickliter (as far as should he still be the coach). I am not calling for anyone to be fired, I'm simply pointing out what I see as a historical perspective.
I don't think I ever heard Jon or Spank say "Alford needs to go" during his final years at Iowa. I do recall hearing about how this team is a player or two away from "turning the corner". Yet now they look back and comment how Alford left Iowa in a world of hurt. I'm not saying they thought Alford was doing great, but I don't recall either one being critical of contract the extensions either.
Now I look at Lickliter. Is history repeating itself? At what point (if ever) would it be conceded that Lickliter isn't the right guy?
Respectfully, if Jon and/or Spank didn’t acknowledge Alford was a bust until after he left I'm not sure they could ever bring themselves to acknowledge Lickliter (who is much more likable than Alford) isn't the answer for Iowa.
I still value and respect both Jon's and Spank's opinion. But looking at it from a historical context I'm just not sure they are the most "progressive" (for lack of a better word) when it comes to admitting it's time to cut the coaching strings. I'm hearing a lot of the same platitudes that I heard when Alford was around.
So if history is any indication of future behavior, if you’re looking for Jon or Spank to say "It's time for Lickliter to go", in my opinion you won't hear it.... until after Lickliter leaves Iowa.